Can’t be stepping on anyone’s IP rights.
Can’t be stepping on anyone’s IP rights.
Ever play the board game Formula D? It’s dice-based rather than card based, but I could easily see how it could be adapted into a card-based game.
I’m still not clear on what exactly she was trying to accomplish. How was acting like a white supremacist supposed to get them the evidence they needed? How was that angle supposed to even work?
Yeah, I’m sure they’re not actually paying full price for game discs, but even so you’ve got the principle of it.
I think the margins on video games just weren’t high enough to support their continued rental. I’d wager they’ll stick around renting movies for a while yet. The one at my local grocery store always has someone using it when I walk by. There are still a lot of people for whom digital isn’t a viable option, and…
I don’t see how that distinction matters. You have to tie yourself to one company or another to get the content you want in either case. Whether that tie is via hardware or service subscription doesn’t matter much to the end consumer. The result is the same either way.
I’d be very surprised if MLB would allow a release delay of more than a few days considering their whole idea here is to get the game in front of a larger audience. Last thing you want is that new audience to feel like they’re getting leftovers.
You can’t do that kind of timed exclusivity with a yearly sports franchise, because the release has to coincide with the latest season of the sport.
Imagine if your TV brand had exclusive channels.
People who don’t think the show is a console seller are mistaken.
It’s not like The Show was a console seller
FNC is Trumps personal channel? REALLY?
I’m right there with you. I did actually finish the game, but by halfway through I was just slogging through it to get it over with. And I agree with you on the narrative structure as well. By the time things were wrapping up, I didn’t understand how a lot of my decisions had brought about the ending that I got, and…
Well, it helps that he skips the poor kids.
Also, who are these people and what’s wrong with them?
Breaking News: developer releases press release that doesn’t tell the whole story, game journalists do journalism to provide missing context, because that’s....you know....their job.
The story is that they gave the project to another studio that apparently couldn’t hack it, and so the game was rebooted and given to an in-house studio instead. All of this tracks right along with the troubled, rebooted development history of pretty much every game in the franchise.
A collective of storytellers eager to push the frontlines of interactive entertainment by making unique, entertaining and thoughtful experiences that engage the world
Expecting those reviewing it to be able to recognise plagerism though? That’s the impossible standard.
One, Sony is a major company, there’s various branches at work, various departments, oversights are more common than you think. Negligence happens on a daily basis. It sucks ass but it does.