Oh, no, it was a mass robocall that hit my workplace, the FBI tracked it down to a specific person in Idaho.

Not news: Ted Cru is a whiny, entitled POS.

I was surprised at how long that Global Warming special bit went on (and that none of the celebrities mentioned during the opening announcement actually appeared in the bit).

That Global Warming Christmas skit was agony. On the other hand Tom Hanks bracketing it within the current framework of the pandemic brought an odd nostalgia irrespective how frequently off it was.

I agree that Garfield was a great Spider-Man, probably the best (Holland’s not done yet). I love ASM’s version of Peter, Gwen, Ben, May and Captain Stacy. But the plots and the way villains were used (through no fault of Ifhan, Foxx etc. imo) were awful and dragged those movies down. Perhaps less so with the first…

I love how the film, created closure for many of the characters, even if resolution was bittersweet. Otto was not only cured, he was also able to hold the miniature arc reactor… the culmination of his life’s work.

Ned having magical potential opens up some interesting possibilities. I was reminded of Sling ring training from Doctor Strange…

Aunt May absolutely died for no reason. She died because she pushed her nephew into making a very dumb decision that barely understood the full ramifications of that the movie barely treats as a triumph. The alternate spider-men barely cared that there respective villains got cured - and like you said in this article…

I absolutely loved it, and had the good fortune to see it with a full masked-and-vaxed enthusiastic audience. The cheers and excitement were Endgame level, more than anything for the Peters Three.

Peters 2 and 3 having no idea who the Avengers are and wondering if Peter 1 was in a band was so, so great.

CAN I HAZ OUT OF THE GREYS PLEASE??

Our best guess is we’ll never see Peter 2 and Peter 3 again.

There’s also the reality that for the SAA, people using them were told to only load 5 chambers in a specific way in order to prevent an accidental discharge even while the hammer was uncocked, due to a hard blow to the hammer potential causing the hammer to hit the primer.

If a live round was loaded, it’s quite…

Indeed.

If I recall correctly, the investigating officers removed over a thousand live rounds of ammo from the set.

As per the interview, he did it because she told him to. She was lining up her shot for the scene. They all thought they had a cold weapon, so none of them thought about how truly dangerous it was. It all points back to how lax safety was on the set.

That definitely sounds like what happened. Take a look at capeo’s post about how the 1873 Colt actually operates—it’s easy to imagine a person who’s not experienced handling that model inadvertently dropping the hammer.

All SA revolvers of that period were apt to misfire. That’s why the norm was to leave the cylinder under the hammer empty.

The first five discussion board comments I found on my Google search for Pietta were complaining about quality and misfires. That would be enough to prompt me not to buy one if I was in the market for a Peacemaker.

Oh absolutely.  It was systemic failure born of a rushed schedule and cheap inexperienced people being hired.