Or we could just burn them all to the ground...

Well, of course they had to fire her. Pregnancies are contagious, after all.

Is that actually Megyn Kelly’s site? I’m not disagreeing with you, she’ll most likely be throwing them nothing but wiffle balls, but all the tweets keep quoting some woman named Krystal Heath. I think this is just some whackadoodle maintaining a website to make it look like it’s Megyn Kelly saying this shit.

Bill Gotherd, the dirty old man who founded ATI, likes his women with long, curly hair. So they get perms.

Typical FoxFucker, Miss Megyn is. Wrong on the facts. Wrong on the comparisons. Wrong on the conclusion.

I’m sure Megyn will have some tough questions for them like “how are you and the kids doing? It can’t be easy being so gleefully attacked by the liberal media and the gay extremists.”

This will be the biggest soft ball/pander to the foxnews crowd interview of all time.

Feminism has found its Tea Party

It makes me wonder if there’s some internalized helicopter/ “special snowflake” parenting going on, too. “Someone said a thing I don’t like. I don’t know how to think outside of my tiny mindset and can’t solve my own problems! I don’t have to put up with that! I must eliminate the source of this discomfort, which is…

The problem here is not feminism. It’s the rather new university atmosphere of caked-on “fear” rearing its ugly head. Instead of engaging others’ arguments, many people in the current collegiate generation have decided that claiming one has been placed in an “unsafe” environment by the “offending” ideas is a more…

No. Can’t tolerate different viewpoints and it’s not just the consent stuff, they also want trigger warnings and to police professors and what they can and can’t teach, lest these delicate flowers be exposed to any form of thinking that doesn’t mesh 100% with their ideology. They’re like the feminist taliban.

I disagree with her parts of view of professor and student relationship but I don’t think she warrants a Title IX investigation. She is expressing an opinion on a sensitive topic that many would disagree with but that is all she is doing. Unless she is abusing students there should be no reason for this. She doesn't…

Jesus, such a dumb ass thing to do. I just don’t see any reason to make a Title IX complaint just because Kipnis wrote a hilariously bone-headed essay. (Yes, Kipnis, schools are cracking down on such relationships and it’s a good thing.)

Read this earlier, and just, wow.

I mean, I was an idiot and a bad person in college too. But I never felt like I had the ability to try to ruin somebody’s life because... well, not because they didn’t agree with me, exactly, but because they agreed with me, but not on every exact thing.

Title IX is one of the greatest…

“symbolically incoherent” is a phrase that a lot of college students need to have in their head when they plan their activism, just saying.

What bums me out most about this is that the question of consent laws, “spheres of victimhood” and the worry about infantilization is SUCH an important and interesting one (and…

Oh FFS....

F’s for everyone!

Sigh...this is why we can’t have “nice” things. Agree or disagree, fine. But really, this kind of thing just adds more fuel to the Rush Limblah army—”Feminazis!” he’ll cry, while sitting on his mountain of money. And the real issues will be swept under the rug as usual.

This is really ridiculous. I’m all for college students speaking out against abuse or hate speak, but this was simply a critically thinking professor who has a different stance/opinion than some other campus feminists. Feminism is not a monolith! We are all allowed to have different feminist beliefs!!

Once again proving that college students have WAY too much time on their hands.