Well, it looks like I'm finally going full PC master-race now. I won't support this bullshit.

I get what you're saying, but it's not the lack of games people are upset about. That's understandable that they'd focus on games at E3. I think most people get that. People are upset about the used games restrictions, online DRM, etc.

Agreed. It's not like I think this will destroy them as a company or anything. They have so much money as a company that I doubt much could. But I just feel like they could have included both audiences instead. Excluding a former market that was quite dedicated isn't usually the best move.

Add this to my last post. I tried to edit it, but an error occured:

You seem to get my point, but are somehow missing it entirely at the same time. Strange.

As if that population even watched that reveal. Only hardcore gamers saw that reveal, and they alienated over half of us, if not more. They fucked up, it's as simple as that. They'll make money, but not nearly as much money as they could have, especially if Sony learns from this fiasco, and realizes that they could…

I don't grossly overestimate the general populace. I just know that when people have options, they don't tend to choose the worst one. If anything, you're underestimating the hardcore gaming populace. I'm not saying that it won't sell. I'm just saying they're going to lose alot of business. Like I've said multiple…

There will always be some kid who would accept the restrictions just to play Halo 5, but not all of us are like that. Especially considering that already 1/4 of the population is excluded. I live in an area with internet, (although not great internet) but I'll never buy this piece of shit. You can come to my house in…

This is a bit different than "server support" considering nearly a quarter of North Americans don't even have internet access. I think this is less about bitching about what we want and what we feel entitled to, and more about inability to use the fucking thing when and where we want (and in the case of 1/4 of North…

Seriously. This. Don't pull facts out of your ass. Right now, a little less than 1/4 (22%) of North American's don't have internet, and something like 37% of Europeans don't. The rest of the world is even worse off. But 80% of all households have internet? Bullshit.

Idk. I don't ever tend to "rage" quit. But I do generally stop playing when I stop having fun. Sometimes I can even be winning, but I'm not having fun. So usu I'll switch to something less competitive, something less intensive, or I'll take a break instead.

The problem with your assumptions thus far is that they're going to sell used games in stores. The word on the street is that "used" games will only be available on Microsoft's online store, and the only way to sell them will be to release the rights to the game. Therefore it would be a monopoly because Microsoft will…

You're nitpicking semantics right now, you know that right? Seriously??? C'mon man...

Instead of doing what everyone else is doing (ie. pettily arguing about the police and about the suspect, etc.) I feel the need to express my condolences towards Mr. Reisse. It's a tragedy when anyone's life is cut short in an accident like this, especially someone with such apparent talent. I'm saddened by this news,…

You obviously don't get what a monopoly is do you? I'm talking about the fact that if Microsoft goes through with this, there will be no other real options for you to buy games at online for your console. Steam, which isn't a monopoly, has multiple competitors whom are selling the same games. Blizzard is a monopoly,…

What difference does an online poll make? A poll is a poll. You're just ignoring the information because it proves you incorrect.

No, they won't. You obviously haven't looked at any of the polls recently asking exactly if games were cheaper (say a used game was 35$ and the new copy 40$) which they would buy. 70%~ say they'd purchase the new game. Of course some people are still going to buy the used game, but when you can get 30% more (from 40%~…

No, they haven't. That's not making New games more preferable, that's making Used games less preferable. There's a huge difference.

People are still arguing about this because Gamestop does do something. They offer a service to people. I'd rather save money than line a publisher's pockets. I like a quality product as much as the next guy, but I also like having electricity and food on my table. I like games, but I'm not willing to pay 60$ for 99%…

No they don't. You kinda proved your own point wrong with that speech. And you're full of it, because Bioshock Infinite is $38 used right now, and $40 new at Gamestop right now. Are you just guessing about this stuff, or making it up? Because it's obvious you haven't actually looked anything up...