“super-moral scolding”

(1) It would take a lot of direct knowledge of the discovery materials to weigh the strength of the motion for summary judgment. The judge can probably decide the disclaimer and indemnity issues pretrial, but if there is a genuine controversy over whether Stewart accelerated that should go to trial.

Please pardon my tone, but as a Jew I wouldn’t consider fallen angels nor rapture a part of my faith

SMDH —Ptolemy

In other news, Robert Griffin III has joined the Trump communications team

Newt Gingrich publicly apologizes for slandering the cause of Supreme Leader Trump

Judging solely from uncontroverted facts like the texts, statements, the fact they recorded video, the fact they took turns and observed each other—The depraved disregard for another person’s dignity, and the sovereign control of her body, is staggering. Just the idea of lining up to “take turns” is in itself…

I agree that theTrumpniks are self-serving rich schmucks, but I must question the hypothesis that inequality gave rise to Trumpism. Mind you, ultra-right-wing populist parties are on the rise in Finland, Norway, Austria, Switzerland, France, Germany, Italy, etc.—Hardly lacking in safety net or upward mobility.

Read it again.

Yes, in Hackbart v. Cincinnati Bengals, Inc. (10th Cir. 1979) the 10th Circuit held that football players and their employers (the team) can be held liable for injuries that are outside the foreseeable, known risk of the game of football. You injure someone in a non-football-play you and your team are on the hook

Two spaces is American law stylebook, for better or worse.

I can tell you from nearly identical experience that I’d hit the gas.

I’m one of those shits. Golf sucks wasteful bourgeois corporate wasp-y cockamamie bullshit gtfo

Apparently Tom Hagen works for the NFL now. He promotes family too...

The insinuation that black voters as a class don't know what's best for themselves or the country is, to say the least, offensive.