How come women can’t go sleeveless when Paul Ryan is allowed to go spineless?

Is he? I think he was a stand-in for the viewer and a foil to avoid having to actually visually depict the rape.

No, in both the books and show having one of the Stark girls at Winterfell is the reason Jon Snow agrees to take Winterfell.

I’ve never understood this complaint. She was just turned 18 and the director knew her since she was 12. Of course they didn’t want to film her being brutally raped.

It wasn’t gratuitous. It was directly from the book. Except the book disgustingly made it a non-POV character and it was all about Theon’s redemption saving a girl everyone forgot about from the first book. All of those chapters are how tortured poor Reek is having to watch a girl being raped by dogs.

the second season was hurt because there was no Cary Fukanaga.

Don’t forget the most important lesson: Nothing you do is good enough. Nothing. And your mom does love Chris more. Just saying.

That’s why it’s important to expose young children to lots of different activities when they’re young. I tried piano, swimming, gymnastics, soccer, baseball, track and field, guitar, etc.

I got nothing for Lace, but since you mentioned Scruples... When I was in high school (around ‘91) a friend of mine lent me an old battered copy of Scruples, and holy shit that one is bonkers too.

My husband read that quote to me and we said in unison, “He hits her.” She’s flying the flag upside down.

Trump seems to be obsessed with women’s blood/women’s bleeding in a disturbing way. Has anyone else commented on this or consulted a psychological expert for further insight? Seriously.

Wow this article sounds more like a litany of petty personal opinions and unfair comparisons than anything.

“As a member of a cartel that wrings out 6% of the cost of your house for doing little actual work . . .”

One of my personal favourite tactics. Highly effective.

But it did start Tom Hank’s movie career. Knowing this movie exists really makes me want to see Tom Hanks play an actual game of D&D.

While I’m glad additional corroboration is coming to light that supports Amber Heard’s statements, I am appalled that this is what is required to believe a woman’s word on intimate partner violence.

“Transgender is believed to arise from a difference in the wiring of the brain vs. physical anatomy.” This is a faith-based argument. A hypothesis without actual evidentiary support.

You will never get an answer to this question that doesn’t rely on a person’s “deep internal feelings” of being the opposite gender, which, by any standard is just something we have to take on faith. Which would be totally fine if self-identification wasn’t starting to change privacy laws, and affect the integrity of…

“Where’s the incest?”