Allow the cars to do 1 battery pack swap per race. Also f-zero/wipeout xl style recharge lanes.

Oooooo. That’s a good idea. I have a pair of the silicone gloves and while you can handle a tray out of the oven quickly, they will start to heat up. 

Oooooo. That’s a good idea. I have a pair of the silicone gloves and while you can handle a tray out of the oven…

Hey if you were trying to express “don’t be like these guys” that’s a fine thing to do. If you want to express, “have better control over your sexual urges” great. But you expressed those ideas with sexist language. 

“I mean, not to put too fine a point on it, the crux of what you’re pushing here is that men are incapable of separating themselves from their sexual desires in any meaningful way—that we’re just base creatures, thinking only of rutting.”

The amount of projection you’re engaging in is staggering at this point. If…

Just realized something else. You say I’m hyperfocused and won’t move the argument, which is true, I’m sticking to this point in particular.But you are ignoring a series of questions I asked earlier completely. Again, projection on your part. If you really want the conversation to move then take a look into those. 

You can keep trying to say that “dudes don’t think with your dick” is not a sexist statement but it doesn’t change reality. I understand you were trying to express the thought of “have more self control over your sexual urges” but you did it in a sexist way. And you can’t admit it and keep tripling down on it.

This seemed to be a more nuanced article on the subject: https://www.letsrun.com/news/2019/05/what-no-one-is-telling-you-about-caster-semenya-she-has-xy-chromosomes/

Lots of projection on your part. Talk about failing to grasp. Look if you made the choice of making a sexist statement then own it. But don’t trying to dress up what you did as not sexist with a bunch of rambling words isn’t going to change it. Pretty simple really.

“You’re taking a statement that is very clearly meant to be an easily-accessible metaphor for allowing basic biological urges to control an individual’s behavior and using the “that’s sexist” canard to avoid having a discussion. This is both intellectually dishonest and cowardly”

How is this intellectually dishonest?…

If you can’t see or admit how “don’t think with your dick” is an anti-male statement to make then yeah I’m not going to get an honest discussion from you. “Hey women, don’t think with your vagina’s”... see how bad that sounds? 

Yeah... you’re just gonna strawman all over the place. Its a topic I would like to discuss because it needs a honest discussion in today’s society. But between the strawmanning and sure to follow ad hominems this isn’t the place for it.

You got any numbers on the rates of harassment between the modestly clad streamers vs. the titty-streamers?

Are you aware of how sexual arousal between men and women are different? Are you aware at all at how sexual signaling works between humans and how clothing plays into that? Are you aware of the difference in sexual drives between men and women? Are you aware at how anti-male that all came out? 

You need to read up on sexual signaling among humans and the differences between how men and women are aroused for answers to some of these questions. 

n/m

The irony of you using the term incel as a pejorative in an article about the word slut and slut-shaming.

I want to see a comparison where a engine is used NA/Turbo/SC. Everything stays the same with the exception of the cams. Then for the dyno charts do integration w/trapezoid rule to approximate the total area under the torque and power curves for each graph so we can get total power and torque output over the rev range…

Angela, If you ever get time look into what the NYPD is doing to Pedro Hernandez.

But not as a separate line item.

The entire post is not irrelevant.