It is biased, but I actually came away saying: “Nah....dude did it.” I know that isn’t the director’s bent, but when they lay out that much evidence directly, it is possible to form an independent opinion.

If only there was some other study that actually looked at what has happened in the year since your study happened (before much of the law even took effect). Oh...wait:

Based on history, they’ve probably done far better than the alternative.