They exist to protect the company, not the employee.
They exist to protect the company, not the employee.
this has been a super triggering week for me, encountering “but what about rape?” as a counter to defunding, over and over and over again. My rapist is a police officer in my city, and I have barely talked about it before this week, but now I’ve been sharing it every fucking time this bullshit take comes up.
Hasn’t he learned? More children never fix a bad relationship.
That was.... my point? All schools should be teaching the Tulsa massacre?
...do you have any idea how many atrocities we’d have to add if we started doing that! There aren’t enough days in the year, let alone weekdays!
Great! Now, how about we add it to EVERY other school's curriculum?
It really feels like they don’t actually believe in women’s liberation. They just believe that men are fundamentally rotten and will never change no matter what happens to society. And I get that a lot of that is shaped by their own traumatic experiences and victimization by men, but they then go on to victimize sex…
I have a pet theory that this line of thinking is a direct result of sex-based traumas. Like, so many 2nd wavers have fought for the advancement of women in the workplace, but it was always at the expense of their femininity and sexual agency. They put up with unbelievable horseshit, all while doing the work and…
And yet I’ve never seen these same women seriously advocate for the abolition of marriage. Which would probably be a much more radical feminist proposition.
They should just follow either the British or German models and just make it legal.
This view of women’s sexuality as something uniquely sacred that isn’t allowed to be commodified when nearly everything else on the planet is.
It honestly feels like they personally find sex work distasteful and they think everyone else must feel the same way.
Toni Van Pelt… deemed the bill an “extreme threat to women and girls” and claimed sex work was “the most extreme version of the violent oppression of women.”
It’s just so regressive. This view of women’s sexuality as something uniquely sacred that isn’t allowed to be commodified when nearly everything else on the planet is. If they really hate exploitation why aren’t they against all capitalism? Why zero in on this one form of work? And usually the same “feminists” who are…
It goes beyond finding it distasteful, they sincerely believe that commercialized sex injures all women. The quiet part loud: they see women engaged in consensual sex work in the same light they see industry that brazenly dumps toxic materials into the water supply. Similar to anti-choice activists, they downplay the…
Fuck the Nordic model. You can’t make only half a transaction whatever that transaction may be illegal, it makes literally no sense. They should just follow either the British or German models and just make it legal.
I do not understand sex-work exclusionary feminists. It honestly feels like they personally find sex work distasteful and they think everyone else must feel the same way. How are they any different from anti-choice activists?
omg, I love her. Can’t wait to watch this!
Congratulations on the film!
Jokes on you, all men have a secret pouch of brewer's yeast implanted in the lining of the stomach upon their 13th birthday. Gimme some water and malt and I'll be drunk as a lord in 3-5 weeks depending on the ambient temperature.