Also how ironic is it that among the many comments made to my post, yours is the only one approved. I wouldn’t be surprised if my own rebuttals arent approved

How is it NOT relevant when withholding information and lying to the court is perjury and grounds for mistrial? The writer of the article and what they promote unfortunately don’t make the law

Indeed. Honestly, I’m surprised this has dragged on so long without clear contradictions being recognized. Rose added quite a bit of new information to the case. If a mistrial isn’t decided, I’m curious if the other two defendants will have similar accounts

This case should be a mistrial. The latest text message shows that the plaintiff has withheld evidence, lied to the court and her account is flat out false. Here we have: