(There is no mention of the inevitable nuclear holocaust that follows.)

This is always a fun topic. Just Another Non-Existent Terminal - JANET has been splashing around the web since the late 90s, but I always love a good write up.

I just... girl, what???

The age question goes both ways - a long while ago, I had someone ask me how I felt “working with people much more distinguished” than I (because I would be working for a certain law school with a scholarship program). At the time I was bright eyed and fresh out of school, so who was I to question a law school dean?…

Look, if you do a little digging you can find out what's going on.

Also, they didn't even order anything related to being gay! They were profiled for being gay themselves... they aren't guilty of forcing them to do anything that would have infringed on their right. They're trying to hide behind the first amendment and that doesn't work...

Of course it isn't, but they cannot refuse a service based on the fact they were gay. The message is important, but the good itself is not.

Actually, providing a good does not constitute the same as speech - most recently with this case: http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2013/12/0…

Isn't this discrimination on the basis of association? Which is illegal and federal law (See Title III - 3.5 of the ADA).

What's the point of your post? That I forgot to include an asterisk to state that AGE OF CONSENT LAWS APPLY? Get out of here with this weak shit trying to distance yourself from the argument. Two consenting adults are allowed to be together and any form of side-eye about their age difference is discrimination.

But it is. James Franco did not pursue her when he found out she was not 18. You're hiding behind the ruse that he wanted to go after her even if she was 17. He did not. That a 35 year old wants to pursue an 18 year old is - nothing. As soon as you place judgment, yes, that is ageism. You are enabling people to say…