The reason I’m going to call that not shade is because it was delivered during a charity roast when she was up on stage for the express purpose of making fun of him. Thus, obvious and not shade.

There was one comment by Hillary at the Catholic roast thing that I’d love to see a ruling on. She pointed out Bloomberg sitting in the room and said “It’s a shame he’s not speaking tonight. I’m curious to hear what a billionaire has to say.”

While we’re talking about Hillary insulting (but not throwing shade at) Trump, this made me laugh so hard:

Whoa.......oh yeah, that’s shade.

THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING.

But was the Planned Parenthood pink dress Clinton wore at the Catholic dinner shade? I like to think it is.

Owl see if I can refrain.

Isn’t that a little hawkish to not let others take wing like you have already?

Same here, those jokes really ruffle my feathers.

No more bird jokes on this post, I prey.

This show is SO GOOD. Issa Rae is hilarious, and I cannot recommend it highly enough.

Liev Schreiber shares a manager with Angelina Jolie, who timed both divorce announcements impeccably.

It’s good to see gossip reporters be so Theroux in covering all of the angles.

Why don’t you write an article about it or start a movement yourself if you’re so concerned?

“But as data scientists and policing experts often note, comparing how many or how often white people are killed by police to how many or how often black people are killed by the police is statistically dubious unless you first adjust for population.”

Because of your name, I’m assuming you’re being intentionally ironic.

Because the world doesn’t revolve around white people. Because black people are disproportionately the victims of cop shootings. Because too many people believe it isn’t really a problem. Because its the symptom of systemic and institutionalized abuse and racism. Because we’re a first world country where minorities…

Why don’t you take a moment to think about this callous and irrelevant remark?

You’re not wrong to say this smells funny, but there is no way to separate this into one part “serious racial discrimination” and one part “less so, but still serious gender discrimination” without reducing the former. Let’s not reduce this. Not one bit.