Alfa Romeo is FCA.
Alfa is the Cadillac to Fiat’s Chevy.
I first typed out Alfa is the Chrysler to Fiat’s Dodge but then realized that Alfa=Fiat=Chrysler=Dodge so it was a bit silly.
Alfa Romeo is FCA.
Alfa is the Cadillac to Fiat’s Chevy.
I first typed out Alfa is the Chrysler to Fiat’s Dodge but then realized that Alfa=Fiat=Chrysler=Dodge so it was a bit silly.
We’ll summarize the drivel below (actually above).
Agreed, although I’m guessing the private sector isn’t allowed nuclear-powered vessels coz A) it’s a nuclear reactor and this would make a great target for a huge dirty bomb by nefarious peeps, and B) the private sector is full of dickheads who if they can shortcut something to save money, they will. Do we really need…
Oh now you’re just trolling.
Also in the VW product pipeline
Some websites can have more than one editorial position, you know? That’s usually why they hire different writers..
Well, that didn’t take long.
Thank you for the penguin. Was gonna have to burn my eyes out, otherwise.
As a casual and fairly infrequent cyclist, I have opinions on how cyclists regard traffic laws, but I don’t feel like that’s the point of this article or the issue at hand.
It has less to do with being a “liberal” city and more to do with the fact that much of the city’s expansion during the latter half of the 19th and early half of the 20th centuries was entirely unplanned. Things were built as they needed to be. The different boroughs essentially operated autonomously, meaning hardly…
Nothing that sells that well is a waste of development budget.
They tried that back in 1865. Didn’t work out so well for them.
So if there’s nothing Volkswagen left, is it really a Type 1?
This has been the federal government’s coronavirus response in a nutshell: begrudgingly ordering up a half-baked solution it didn’t even end up using all that much.
Red Flag in your garage? A Hongqi of course!
No room in the garage for a vehicle.
2. is definitely a yes, drivers do not set their own rates, the “tech” companies set the rates and can penalize drivers for refusing too many rides. if the “tech” companies truly want to keep it a contractor relationship then they need to allow those contractors to set their own rates and remove penalties for refusing…
um, no, they don’t pass 1) or 2). They have some control over drivers in that they penalize them if they aren’t accepting “enough” rides. They also control what they pay drivers; drivers are not free to negotiate their own rates.
Uber and Lyft set requirements for what kind of cars they can drive, and they set the fares for the rides. They have a lot of control over the drivers.
I don’t think that is nearly as clear cut as you suggest, nor apparently do the lawyers and courts involved.