juniperbell--disqus
Juniper Bell
juniperbell--disqus

I agree, the final song felt a little 'This is Us' or 'Parenthood' for me..*insert singer songwriter here* to close off on an uplifting beat

And tell us if it was worth killing your family for or if it was funnier as you remembered it.

Be sure to post the link!

At this point they are just leaving money on the table. Just branch out the 00 movies with all the potential Bond wannabe's. That way everyone get's to be a sexist loner with mommy issues and make a shit tonne of dinero.

No, it's Coon. And she sadly didn't get nominated

Pretty sure you two are referring to the same ep.

May the air be filled with pestilence

Disliked that role..her work on Leftovers was amazing though

Not to mention Caitriona Balfe for Outlander or Eva Green for Penny Dreadful..

And it pays off for GoT

I think it was Jack pushing his luck. Don't think it is a part of the ritual of accepting a duel. I guess Jamie allowed it for the time being, seeing as he was already reining in all his anger..an I also saw it as a dirty gesture of possession by Jack, and I'm sure Jamie flinched/ froze just like we did..

If I remember correctly, in the book they meet him at Sandringham's estate? Mary is running away, Claire follows her and then she bumps into Jack. Jamie comes along shortly after. That is when Jamie puts Claire in the carriage home while he challenges Jack to a duel. Later he is talked out of it by Claire, as we see

Sam was sooooo good in that scene,..so good. I find he tends to over-emote, but he was so restrained, he let his eyes do all the work.

But how can something in the future have effect on the past? Like, if Claire is in the past, wouldn't she stay in the past? And then, If they changed the future, then maybe she wouldn't be born in 1918 (or something) and then never go back to the past a second time around..just only that one time.

Whoops. I guess feeding the bairn and replying is not a good combo!

Never ment to imply it was bad..I thought it was spectacular!
My meaning must have got lost in translation.

Claire just Broke Bad. And I still love her for it.

I'm not too versed in time travel intricacies but If they live their lives together now, does it matter if Claire doesn't exist later on (and travel back ct ect).. I assume Jamie believes in 'the present' and 'later on'..but without really thinking about the repercussions for a 'much later on'..

Well I agree that they are implying a formidable opponent for Claire, but I think Stanley's acting is not signalling disdain for Claire, but awe..

Yeah I can see what you're saying. Cross cutting with a happy party vibe seems to undercut the severity of the rape, though it could also emphasise it by showing that rapes happen while other people are just going about their day.