you didn’t realize your smelly, dirty feet shouldn’t be exposed in a confined space where there is no option to avoid them? sigh.
you didn’t realize your smelly, dirty feet shouldn’t be exposed in a confined space where there is no option to avoid them? sigh.
it's not prosperity shaming, it's calling out out-of-touch rich people for be ignorant or indifferent of social injustice. prosperity shaming? are you serious?
me, too — but kool aid man has always been boss.
Amazon sucks. no thanks.
why, because she says what most women secretly think? seriously though, if you don't think there are women with these exact thoughts, you don't get out much ....
A (good) professional editor, wouldn't think "I don't work for free" they'd think "I don't work free." "For free" is illiterate and redundant — even if widely acceptable.
you cared enough to say the writer. way to rationalize your mistake though.
you do realize reporters don't write headlines?
When does "effective editorial policy" become censorship? To paraphrase John Stuart Mill — let the ignorance speak for itself, it will only make the truth stand out.