There are plenty of labs doing recreational drug "research" on animals including UCLA who addicts monkeys and rats to meth.

At this point i feel like throwing up. I don't consider your viewpoint evidence either so why should anyone take your "opinion" as more valid than someone who has a medical degree and happens to work for PETA??? "most scientists form close bonds" what a joke. Really? Including the one's that have been videotaped…

hahahahahaha! Misinformation??? Because vivisectors don't misinform ever do they. IACUC are staffed with vivisectors so that you can rubber stamp everything. Again, bias much? "Those who won't hesitate to vivisect, won't hesitate to lie about it as well." – George Bernard Shaw - never a truer word spoken George.

"How hard it is" you're kidding right! it doesn't seem to be that hard to fund recreational drug experiments at UCLA or maternal deprivation experiments at UW Madison and oversight??? Again, defensive much? The system is riddled with ineptness you only have to watch the videos and read the reports to see that is SO…

How about looking at cancer research that has ..wait for it...cured cancer in MICE after 20 years and millions of dollars. And that is admitted by the man who, yes you guessed it, actually did the research on mice. Or, how about looking at the 90% of animal tested drugs that FAIL in humans killing a whopping 100,000…

Of course, as soon as I heard the original article had come under attack by the "research" community I figured it had to be Jenstch and his trolls. And of course they have to bring up "the car" (probably Jentsch planted the bomb himself since he loves media attention so much) because that is what they do. Divert…

I am utterly disgusted that you became such a shrill to the animal experimenters. Of course they have never had a biased article placed in the news have they!! And of course they would come together to attack the writers sources. Since when has a qualified Doctor been a bad source? Just because she works for PETA? Dr.…