He was not prosecuted for assault. It was for sex acts with a minor under 18. There was no assault here because it lasted for a long time and in her own words in article after article she stated that she took herself to meet him. But we’ll never know the truth in this story because there was no trial because it was…

It is not a lack of ethics when repeating facts, words and actions, taken by the plaintiff years after the affair. They were all stated in her own words. In articles that she gave interviews in. She had years to come forward from the stated time point she said she “realized” it hurt her and therefore the statue of…

This was not rape. It was sexual acts with a minor, (which I repeat is legal at 16 in many, many US states and in the civilized, sane, western world). Read the statue. She was not raped.

Well. Let’s see. 16 is not a child. It’s a young adult. It’s legal in most US states. In all of Europe. She admitted in one article a while back that she drove herself to his house to meet him. In a sane world that would be considered consent and participatory. That would be in all of Europe and many US states. Except…

Perhaps because at these private schools there is a high level of sophistication of the student body due to their affluent lifestyles, and jet setting parents. They have seen and done many things that most of the population never do. They grow up much faster. Very sophisticated in every single way.

Read the stories that lead up to this. She had a relationship with this teacher according to her because we still don’t know what happen. In her own words she drove to his house she stated in one article. All by herself. She drove herself. Those were her actions. No one else.

The sad irony is that these students are highly sophisticated and well-traveled. Wise beyond their years. They know what they’re doing.

This happened over 15 years ago. Not 40. And in many, many US states she is not considered a minor where the age of consent is 16, sometimes 15. Why? Because you can go to prison for murder as an adult at 16 so you can obviously consent to sex.

Not a child. Never was one in this case. 16 is not a child. You can go to prison for murder as an adult at that age in California. A young adult.

Not a child. 16 is a young adult. Not a child. Please. 16 is the age of consent in many US states. Starting with a short 5 hour drive to Neveda. This is only about money. Period. Rather repugnant.

Exactly. And the age of consent is 16 in many US states. California is no liberal state. It’s just because there is lots of money to be made that charges were ever brought over a decade later when the statute of limitations had expired.

16 is not a child. It is a young adult. Age of consent in many US states is 16 as in the civilized western world. This case won’t stand ground in Nevada. It wouldn’t stand ground in all of Europe. In many US states. Why? Because 16 year olds know what they are doing. Especially when they come from an elite private…

True