she didn’t livestream anything, that’s a lie the hospital made up and you fell for it.  

I don’t understand how this is affected by the Roe v. Wade decision. This is in NY, which not only doesn’t have restrictions on abortion, it explicitly has laws protecting it. Things in NY are, by law, no different than they were prior to the Roe v. Wade overturning. So what are the grounds this doctor is doing this…

somebody shoot this piece of shit.

Not true at all. In a public place you have no expectation of privacy and wiretapping statutes don’t apply. Consent for recording only comes into play in private, and in a one-party consent state you can secretly record any and all conversations you are a party to.

Sued for what, exactly?

If the doctor’s personal philosophy potentially violated the Hippocratic oath, then she’s well within her rights. Or will you also be clutching pearls about the other patients that posted negative reviews of the same doc as well and telling what they should be doing instead?

I’m not talking about my personal feelings on cars. I live in a city, and currently I drive a car most places. I’m talking about the issues that have actually been studied relating to the ways cities are designed to facilitate automotive traffic.

Of course it’s not. But a large part of the reason why people can’t use bikes is that we have spent the past hundred years increasingly designing our urban spaces around automobiles above all else. I’m not saying we get rid of cars, I’m saying the only way we can ever hope to reduce our reliance on them is to start…

I think it’s worth noting that cars are, objectively, bad for cities. They take up a ton of space, cause more pollution than their highway-bound counterparts, and contribute massively to urban areas becoming less community-driven. Replacing car-focused spaces with ones designed for bikes and pedestrians is an…

Priviledged? Ummm people who bike/walk the most for transportation are handicapped people, minorities and poor people. These people statistically have a higher rate of being hit by drivers. Secondly the people who benefit the most from bike and pedestrian infrastructure are those who are visually impaired, or are…

The tone here feels like you’re trying to somehow invalidate bike line advocacy groups on the basis that they’re “in bed” with an unpopular brand. In reality they have converging objectives. Fewer cars on the road is good for both parties. Hardly feels like a conspiracy. Pretty smart all around.

“We can’t make changes that decrease car dependence because we’re dependent on cars and can’t make any changes that inconvenience drivers.” Guaranteed the folks using free parking in that neighborhood are much wealthier than the average resident, and for every person who uses their car for work/disability issues,…

Actually getting rid of publicly subsidized parking and adding bike infrastructure is extremely good.

It’s a simple feeling of unfairness, compounded by the feeling that others’ irresponsibility is lengthening the pandemic, and even a personal hurt if they’ve personally lost friends and family.

“You’re most likely mad at yourself for denying yourself the pleasures that someone else enjoyed.”

The scolds are often simply reacting to the same vacuum of information by clinging to a type of superstition: As long as I forcefully denounce the risk-takers then I myself will be made safe.

Again your ignoring the totality of their criminal justice platform. Bernie has the most progressive platform in this regard and is the only candidate in favor of giving incarcerated individuals their voting rights back. So I and other’s are still confused how you came up with these rankings. 

you’re not wrong. watch, im taking names and gender out.

It seems like he may have ranked them first and assigned points afteewards to justify the ranking

kind of fucked up buttigeig is higher up than bernie is, did you forget he doesnt give a shit about the poc in his small indiana town?