interestingly enough, i believe the spanish version of "um" is "este"
JRu
juanr
Just to be clear here, this is what that pussified douchebag did to a child:
Meanwhile, Joe Biden is still waiting for that stuffed Pikachu he ordered off the internet yesterday...
You don't have a point, you fucking mouthbreather. You have an ax to grind. You have a powerful article to try and shout down and take off topic with your bullshit. Fuck you.
That's a crock of shit and you know it. This story is about men who've abused women based upon a high profile case and you're deliberately attempting to change it. Your shit stinks.
Oh, christ, just go back to A Voice For Men. You might as well argue the fucking thing should be about ponies because that's what you want to read about. This article was about women. Do you read an article about dogs and then get outraged it's not about elephants? Because that's what you're trying to do here.
Yes but if someone is writing an article on Ray and Janay Rice and why her victimology is so common, of course the article is going to focus in on female victims of domestic violence. I'm sorry for what happened to you, but please realize that your comment is completely unrelated to the topic at hand. Also, it makes…
The number of people who read this column and got the impression that men are never the victims of abuse: ZERO.
Because it is really one sided. Check the numbers. The one in the article about being intimate with their killer is pretty indicative. Do women abuse men? Yes. As much? No, not even close. Pretending it is is jus fantasy.
Of all the women murdered in 2010, nearly 40 percent were killed by a spouse or someone they were dating, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics. This number has been 30 percent or higher since 1996.
I don't think you actually appreciated the column if your response is to point to situations in which women have victimized others. That was not the point nor is it relevant. No one is suggesting that only women are victims.
We call it "Soda" 'round these parts.
I wish people at Walmart would abide by that.
Am I sure? Not really, it's a dicey area and I'm perhaps there isn't one blanket rule that is ethical for each situation. What initiatives a person has donated to? Definitely ethical to report on. Marital infidelities while they run on a "family values and traditional marriage platform? It's personal but directly…
And there, my friends, is a single microcosmic example of why American women will never vote Republican.
yeah, what idiot named this drug? I cannot think of a worse name. There is a reason science majors should take mandatory writing classes....
"Grown up books"? Do you prefer having morals and lessons served up to you to making your own judgments? Not a fan of critical thinking?
I dunno. I can name about a dozen books I've read and reread as an adult because of how much they've meant to me, and I don't consider myself a great reader at all. A 10-20 books a year type of guy. Maybe you need to read better books?
It depends what people mean by influential. If "influential" means "shared cultural experience," I get why Harry Potter's on there. If "influential" means "changed the way I think" and you're saying Harry Potter, really, son? Come on, son!