Explore our other sites
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    juanr
    JRu
    juanr

    For a different perspective on Goude, there is this article that basically accuses him of racial fetishizing.

    Nope. You can post totally hardcore pics and they are not taken down. Well, at least if choose to follow, say, a porn star, the pics aren't taken down. Maybe it's different if they are used in different ways, like to harrass.

    But if those supposed "pro-prostitution organizations" were indeed in the hands of sex-workers themselves, you'd actually listen to them? Ha!

    Ugh. Yes. Probably.

    Maggie McNeill, like most, want decriminalization. Key sentence from that article:

    I dunno. Here is what the head of the Immigrant Council says:

    That's one of the arguments against the Scandinavian Model: that those who still would risk buying it would tend to be more dangerous.

    Uh, unless show-ers have a permanent erection, of course they also grow.

    I read the comments to this last night on HP, and I'd say over 90% were dismissive of her. But from both men AND women.

    Songs?

    Yes. Duncan would have tested negative right off the plane as well.

    I wish I had gone to a pubic high school...

    I'll add a bit more.

    First, she was a substitute teacher. You don't need a full credential for that, just a temporary document. Second, some credential programs are fast-track and take just a year (after college).

    But she wasn't just an ordinary reader, was she? I thought she was selected to receive an advance copy of the book and posted her review before the book even came out?

    Indeed. Author needs more exposure to penises, apparently.

    Ha! Yes, I originally wrote "me and Susie," but changed it to match something else I wrote below that. I've recently been living in a poor area of Indiana (my first red state), and I've heard "Susie and me" and lots of other strange things, but, yeah, "me and Susie" is more common. But here in Indiana I hear white

    That's an interesting case.

    Uh, who was the one who corrected it?

    The English of the majority of US speakers no longer features "whom" in everyday speech. Probably the vast majority. So it has already been "removed" from everyday speech.