Because over 90% of businesses are on the ground.
Because over 90% of businesses are on the ground.
If this is just your elaborate justification to get a sexbot, I’ll support you as much as you need.
Bonneville Saltless Flats.
Keep in mind this means that if they feel the number of cars on the grid is unsafe, they can't say shit.
IndyCar does not employ the drivers.
Why would people own one instead of just using a shared service?
We, The Faithful, understand that there has been a massive Gawker shakeup, and we sympathize. But please, taking hostages is NOT the answer. I’m sure that we can come to some sort of arrangement if you will just give our Torch back. I don’t know what KIND of arrangement, I’m not the kind of person who can come up with…
Why would Apple (or anyone else) even a car like this? There’s no reason for this to be in a driveway 95% of the time. You’d just offer it as a service (zipcar meets Amazon prime). Your stuff shows up, you unload it (or maybe it just drops things off), and then it wanders off to do something productive for someone…
That truck advertised for on AutoTraitor.com.
this is bullshit. a helmet does two things:
My MUST HAVES are always the helmet and gloves. When it comes to more than that it depends on where im riding, what im riding, and, as is the case in Texas, which level of hell best represents the outdoor temperature that day.
If aluminum is so much better than steel, Andrew, why can’t you crush a steel beer can on your forehead? #science
BMW not allowing access to a jointly developed prototype? Germans not sharing or playing nice? You don’t say! (See DaimlerChrysler, Suzuki / VW, Germany / Greece)
I will leave the assessments of the inspections regime to the non-proliferation experts, who appear to be in near universal support for the deal.
I’ve read Getting To Yes... we’re talking about diplomatic negotiations where millions of lives hang in the balance. This is not a car lease or an employee contract negotiation.
You give Israel way to much credit. What exactly do you think they are going to do? Bomb them? Way to much infrastructure for them to attack, and way to far away to sustain the bombing campaign they would need to do. Nuke em? Yep, I guess they could do that, and then force every other middle-east country to try to get…
I am happy for the deal. Sanctions just reinforce their resolve to make a bomb. Pandering to their enemies also just gives them the moral high ground to build a nuclear weapon as well (if moral high ground and nuclear weapons can go together).
Not so strange, I think. For Israel, it’s easy - they are Muslim, therefore enemies. for the Gulf Stares, it’s easy - They are the wrong flavor of Muslim, therefore enemies.
Most of the “Cons” aren’t negative at all. They’re simply how things will continue to operate despite our best efforts to achieve them.