And that makes no goddamn sense. The Kings also had to go DOWN to give the Rangers said "considerable advantages," because opposed to popular belief, the Rangers were playing in away in which put them well ahead of the so called far superior team. Your logic is one sided.

Uh that's what I said.

No it's not. We don't live in absolutes. They are the champion. That's what the title represents. Not the best team.

Yes the Kings are better, but they've led in regulation for all of 40 minutes and 1 second. It's not as lopsided as people make it out to be. Probably should be a 2-2 series. (Back to back losses with 2 goal leads is pretty rare)

10969 words. 24 pages in a word document with 11 pt calibri font.

HAHA, holy shit dude. Typos in no way express intellect. It's not remotely similar to misspelling something or making a grammatical error. It's a slip of one's finger you fucking idiot. Also, what you're doing is called deflecting and you're doing it because I made a coherent point and you had nothing of substance to…

Lol, the Kings have led in regulation for 40 minutes and 2 seconds. The Rangers gave away 2 wins in the first two games and out shot their opponent in the 3rd game by a huge margin. Your revisionist history is cute, since it "fits" with what you expected, even though what you expected really hasn't happened besides…

I'm willing to bet that a 28 year old man who plays a sport as intensely and as often as Lebron does and is 6'9" 260 lbs can get away with the extra 700 or so calories.. I mean considering his daily calorie intake to maintain weight is roughly 4000 calories. I'm sure he can get all of his other nutrients in his…

haha Rough games are now 25 pts on 9/17 shooting in 33 minutes. I like how gently the narrative has gone from him being injured, quickly to him being a pussy because of said injury, to him now not even playing well in game 1. Yes it's semantics, but it all adds up to the bullshit perception people have of Lebron.

It is a 30 minute show with no guests and no commercials. Basically the Daily Show has 10-15 minutes for news and segments. While nov15-22 got the time wrong, he got the sentiment right.

I'm glad you think smart basketball is deferring in tight situations. Oh shit, I'm double teamed, but I have to prove I'm the best player ever, so let me take a contested shot, in lieu of passing to the open man. You might have had an argument 3 NBA Finals ago, but your take is getting so tired. Let's see what you say…

Nope, we share the exact same feelings. Unless it's the Knicks winning (lol, nothing to worry about there), I'm pulling for Lebron until he gets his 7th title. I can't wake the bullshit MJ-Lebron comparison either. I also can't stand the way morons romanticize the past. Sure, Michael Jordan was a basketball genius who…

I have nothing witty to say, but I will say that this was amazing and he can legitimately sing pretty well for a non-performer (and yes auto-tune and synthesizers do amazing things), probably about as well as Nick Minaj. Do your thing you big goof. That was great.

Listen, I don't give a big shit about singular players legacy, so I don't really care if you think Michael is a god and Lebron is a wuss, but I will point out that you comparing a man with the flu and a man who's muscle were literally in a contracted state to the point where they don't actually move is ridiculous.…

I didn't realize someone pointing out childish behavior insinuated racist undertones. Learn something new every day...

Just squeeze your glottis really tightly while you try to say it, that way you're letting less breath out as you say it. Problem solved.

Oh and no need to apologize man, I irrationally justify things about sports teams and players I hate all of the time.

You're somehow a combination of a prisoner of the general moment (last seasons shortened season and this years regular season where Lundqvist wasn't quite as good as he was in 2012 and before) and somehow not a prisoner of the moment in the sense that he's a goalie who just willed his team to the Stanley Cup Finals…

Do you consider Patrick Roy and Dominik Hasek part of his generation? I was comparing him to them, because he's the only player from HIS generation who stacks up to them statistically. 4 wins and the last bit of your argument goes out the window, even though any argument about individual greatness based on team…

In what fucking world is Crawford or Price better than Lundqvist. Seriously no single measure would bring any thinking human to that conclusion. Rask has put up some pretty incredible numbers, but he's only been full time for 2 or 3 years so it's pretty hard to put him at Lundqvist's level. Just a reminder of…