It’s a real AMG GT...

Ummm, welcome to 2010?

Not true, in the 80 and early 90‘s some could be ordered with them, even the monster AMG Hammer had one. They were rare, but out there. Once absorbed completely by Mercedes though, that ended.

Apologies - I have jet lag - but I do not understand the series of specs in 3 adjacent paragraphs (bolds mine):

It’d be worse if they said, “This shall...” Then it’d be matter of fact and pretentious.

That’s not how blog titles work. They have to be click-bait bullshit, because click-bait works and clicks are everything.

I really, really wish the hipster millenial writers for this site would take a lesson on titling an article. Please stop with the “this will...” or “you will...” titles. Quit being so matter of fact on every goddamn article! Pick up a magazine (yeah, we used to read automotive articles in those), and have a look at…

Imagine if Cadillac were the Cadillac of cars! What a world!

Some of us choose not to do stuff like that in order to show some damn respect.

He doesn’t need to signal if he’s continuing forward into the right-turn only lane, but at some point he’s going to have to start signaling that right-hand turn.

Karma............I love it!

He’s not signaling to merge, so he MUST have been planning to continue forward in that lane, which immediately becomes a right-turn only lane.

Counterpoint: It’s less safe to attempt a merge from a dead stop and the cop was blocking the road.

...baiting, perhaps? When it’s a yield you need to be more ambitious or else you’ll never make it in that traffic.

well in defense... what the hell was the cop doing just sitting there? Waiting on an invitation?! I feel the road rage just watching that... GOOOOOOOOO!!!!!

Yeah, I mean don’t go around them, but there really wasn’t any need for the cop to be stopped there, they have a lane in front of them, so pull into it, and merge at speed rather than trying to do it from a stop.

I don’t understand the comparison in this story at all.

Briefly protecting motorists from blowouts doesn’t solve the problem.

I think I would object to the “too dangerous to fly” part, but I’m assuming that means anyone on the government’s “no fly” list. From what I’ve ready, that list as very easy to get on and exceedingly hard to get off of. It’s also largely arbitrary. It would probably not impact a large number of people (but given…

Thanks for this Patrick, proponents of gun control really need to do research like this to see why a lot of the proposed legislation is in fact stupid. That doesn’t mean that there aren’t measures that can be taken that are smart but you have to be educated in the subject at hand first before you can make that…