Also, understand the current laws and the terminology.

I think his point is fair, though it’s totally a straw-man.

The problem is that, right or wrong, consumer product “press” are made up of enthusiasts. Let’s not confuse this group of “journalists” with the White House press corps. The applause that you get at a VW press conference is the same applause you get an an iPhone announcement: it’s excitement for new products.

It doesn’t break down the number who leave voluntarily and those forced out. Here’s another line:

The estimates are very clear. It says the number of uninsured Americans will increase from 4 million in 2019 to 13 million in 2027. Almost all of the difference is from those who will voluntarily opt out because they are not compelled by the mandate.

So is sliding into a coworker’s DMs inappropriate? Or totally acceptable?

“I eat pieces of shit like you for breakfast!”

You are correct.

Before even watching it, I knew that was the cause. Video confirms.

Wow, there is so much hating on Deadspin.

Don’t expect the hatch.

It seems pretty clear to me that Rizzo isn’t aiming for the plate. Hedges is set in front of the plate, and Rizzo aims for Hedges, not the plate. It seems to me like he’s breaking the rule.

Classic Gawker headline.

Since you’re playing semantics, an image of an animal isn’t an animal either. It’s a representation of an animal, and I’d argue that a word represents an animal as well as an image does.

I had a 2-door GTI for a few years. The hatch was perfect for stuff, including a bike. I even had my infant in the back seat. It wasn’t ideal squeezing his car seat passed the front seat of the car, but it worked.

The chemicals in the battery are technically fuel, so the message is correct. However, it’s certainly not the common use of the term “fuel.”

As you point out, the concept of the paleo diet is “don’t eat anything a caveman couldn’t eat,” not “don’t eat anything a caveman wouldn’t eat.”

“Did no one tip them off that the people who still remember the Eclipse coupe fondly don’t care about crossover boom?”

I did, which I succinctly summarized in the second sentence. What you seemed to say, and please correct me if I’m wrong, is that if the companies with the property don’t follow your morals and ethics (or even the laws), then you shouldn’t have to either.

So you like to just, sort of, make up the rules as you go along, making your own determinations of what’s right and what’s wrong. If it’s a small company, you treat them “right.” Big companies get the shaft from you. If they break the law (in some vague, unspecific or verified manner), so can you.