You could argue that, and then instead of celebrating its resilience, we should tear the whole fucking thing down.

The bull could be anywhere in the financial district and make sense. If the girl was 10 yards further away, or rotated a few degrees right or left, it wouldn't have any meaning st all.

But it does change the context. If the bull symbolizes New York's resilience, it isn't a threat that needs to be resisted. It completely changes the meaning of the bill from a symbol of economic resilience that should flourish to a symbol of chauvinism that needs to be broken. The original artist is absolutely right…

"Rogue preacher arrested for religious preferences."

I don't think anyone would care if it was just religious expression.

"Religious references" is an awfully generous spin on his expression of support for executing the governor for blasphemy.

Almost half of the original series coasted a lot on her pluckiness and precociousness from the first 3.9 seasons or so. With the distance between the original series and the Netflix revival, her selfishness and entitlement become overwhelming.

Hopefully they react by slapping whatever inbred fuckwit catechized you as a child.

Trump obviously thought it would. Hillary and Bernie both thought that showing up would help.

Both, e.g., Augustine and Thomas Aquinas agree that the Bible should be read other than literally. It has consistently been the position of the Catholic Church that the Bible shouldn't be read the way evangelicals say it should. Evolution isn't even included in the syllabus of errors, the highwater mark of the…

There was never any point when everyone in the church taught and believed that everything was meant to be taken literally. The idea that everything the Bible must have literally happened in history for it to be true is, perversely, an evangelical innovation in reaction to Darwinism.

His "physical form?" Gnostic punk.

$5 an issue, where each single issue barely advances the story and delays mean a single arc will take 8 months to a year to amount to anything.

There's a 100% chance that in 8-12 months he'll be off the project because Snyder wants to Snyderize it.

It might also be a crime. It doesn't matter to the plaintiff whether it's a crime or not.

Immunity in state court. He's not immune in federal court.

John Paul Stevens thought it was an open question. https://www.law.cornell.edu…

It was filed after the election though, so any trial would have required a state court exercising jurisdiction over him.

No. Dismissal in state court wouldn't affect her ability to sue in federal court.

Even if the president is immune to state court jurisdiction, she could sue in federal court. It is unclear why the plaintiff chose to sue in New York instead of federal court, unless her lawyer was just confused by the "supreme court" thing.