He sounds like a genuinely driven, nice, and thoughtful guy. Unfortunately, he helped make an unbelievably moronic and inappropriate professional decision, and chose that very, very stupid hill to die on.
He sounds like a genuinely driven, nice, and thoughtful guy. Unfortunately, he helped make an unbelievably moronic and inappropriate professional decision, and chose that very, very stupid hill to die on.
Wait, aren’t you guys owned by Gawker? Where’s the part where you find some random, mid level front office guy for the buc’s and out him on his BSDM fetish because it’s ‘news’ and not just to, ya know, randomly ruin his life for no reason.
So, so many bitter jealous people who wish he was on the team that they root for. Brings a smile to my face on Monday mornings.
I mean, is there any doubt this guy is doping? It sure seems like the entire sport does it pretty consistently
Goodell is in pretty much a no win situation here. The is no ‘may contain dodgy science’ its a ‘completely scientifically eviscerated’ situation that the NFL paid >$5 million for, a report to show that Brady ‘more probably than not’ was involved in a deflation that, based on the scientific evaluation of independent…
I’m glad he didn’t win the MVP, he didn’t deserve it. GS’s whole strategy was to let him have the ball and force him to take a ton of contested shots, so he would score a disproportionate amount and the weaknesses of the Cav’s as a team would be exploitable.
To be fair to him, everytown is a very dishonest group that routinely spreads outrageously inaccurate gun statistics
StartFragment
So the wells report gets completely shredded, and the response from a ‘sports journalism’ website is LOL, TL;DR. Amazing.
Enough with ‘Ballghazi’ you guys lost the headline battle long, long ago to deflategate. Deflategate (and most gates) are stupid too, but no one was killed in a terror attack during watergate, cut the ghazi shit out.
“realistically” that word, you keep using it, i do not think it means, what you think it means
Yopu’ll also notice, though this one is sort of glazed over, that they complain about checking the balls AFTER games, and at one point (against the jets) found them to be 16.0+ PSIG. That conversation doesn’t make sense for someone who is getting to the balls after the refs get to them.
They aren’t making stuff up to ‘bring him down’ and its laughable to assume they are at the end of their NFL dominance given their track record. They literally hired a firm known for producing results for their clients to back up this report.
Its not about ‘destroying the face of their brand’ its about parity. The league likes certain things about the pats, to be sure, such as marketability, TV, draw etc.. What they dont like, particularly the owners of the other teams, is dominance.
Plead read the wells report, I did.
No, you are applying the context that YOU want to be true. They could be bitching about that, or about his critique of their ball prep in general. Whole lot of nothing.
4 months, 243 pages, no proof, and a bunch of dick jokes, seems oddly appropriate for the NFL.
He’s the guy in charge of preparing the balls, which the Pats have already said they supply at less than the league minimum “so the refs can inflate them to the proper pressure” or, as Aaron Rogers put it, in hopes that they don’t bother to check. Here, read this
4 months, 243 pages, no proof, and a bunch of dick jokes, seems oddly appropriate for the NFL.
Angry new york fans don’t like red sox song, film at 11...