"Mediocre Comedian Successfully Exploits, Ruins 'Geek Culture'".

Motives? Sure, I'm all in favor of motives. We can't have good stories without them.

Domestic violence is a cause, not a motive.

It seems like you could fit Wonderwall on one CD, maybe.

I think you mean: "This should be funny …. NOT."

I'm a fan of trendy, overrated writers, so this is right up my alley.

Why might you say that? Not only would it be curious phrasing, some would interpret it as an inappropriate double entendre.

How would you describe the results of this cheating?

Even for an American that's stupid.

He was mad when they did something he didn't like, but now he's happy that they did something he does like. What a hypocrite! The NSA's warrantless underwear drawer searches have been completely vindicated!

Frank Zappa was a counterculture hero when I was a kid, and I'm 15 years younger than Maron. I can't imagine what it would be like to be Maron and grow up to date Zappa's daughter. What a mindfuck.

Maron's not a great writer. He's not a great comedian for that matter. What he is is a great interviewer, and that's enough for anyone.

I heard Judge Judy made like $30 million dollars last year and I'm like, 'I never even heard of the guy."

Not homeless shelters. I swear to Christ they got more fuckin' programs for these deadbeats.

Spider-Ham or bust.

I think I use Crackle via my Roku box. Does that count as a web hit?

I didn't follow you here but I'm not sure what you could have meant by your comment on the other thread if you weren't referring to people commenting on her looks.

Weren't you just bitching about commenting on Emma Stone's looks?

I read the headline as "The Kids in the Hall are Aging Before Your Eyes" and I thought "man they've been doing that for a long time."

I dunno. Is it okay to talk about killing and eating someone if you add a Hannibal Lecter quote? These are the kinds of ethical dilemmas I'm not qualified to answer.