More insults, more refusal to address the substance of my comments.

Ah, well then, anyone who echoes any of their arguments must echo ALL of their arguments, eh?

Ah, so the path to compromise is to ignore the other side’s argument while calling them juvenile names.

That’s a very reasonable perspective; I simply disagree.

I am not criticizing his religious beliefs. I’m saying his political actions of the last four years are inconsistent with his personal beliefs and his political actions while governor of Virginia, and this raises the question of his sincerity.

I do.

So...you’re just ignoring everything I wrote.

Brilliant except:

Agreed.

Addendum: I should’ve attached the caveat somewhere in there that, while the VP pick does echo many of Hillary Clinton’s negatives, it is largely meaningless.

Nope.

Yes, like I said, for the last 4 years, he has been staunchly pro-choice, which is odd coming from a man who says he is personally against abortion and had no problem tolerating anti-abortion laws while governor.

Very true.

Except they are—I didn’t say he was staunchly pro-life. He has repeatedly said he is personally against abortion and, until reaching for bigger political stars in 2012, governed a State that drew scorn from the local NARAL chapter.

Has anti-abortion leanings.

I’m confused.

A. I’ll go out on a limb and say the OP wasn’t saying “toss him from the NFL based on these pictures and the alleged victim’s story without any further investigation.”

A. I said “some non-negligible probability.” I did not say it was probable or even a significant probability. The fact is, we know—with absolute certainty—what Hillary Clinton would do because she’s already done it. It’s one of the few things on which she has remained consistent.

No, it’s not the same thing.

Why would you believe Hillary Clinton is sincerely anti-torture simply because she said so during an election?