Steal away.

Yes, this is all is fear mongering.

All of those are subsets of campaign finance reform.

Where have I argued that Bernie Sanders would be able to get things done where Clinton and Trump would fail?

If you insist on being a troll, learn to do it better.

Right. Then I welcome the destruction because the nominal Democratic Party has been as much a part of the problem as the GOP has.

Because neither Hillary Clinton nor Donald Trump will be able to do much of anything considering the President needs Congress to make any fundamental, substantive changes.

Are we talking the organization called the Democratic Party? Or are we talking about the ideals on which a party claiming to be democratic should be based?

Except, again, those are not the actual facts of the situation. Perhaps the hyperlink was too subtle for you? If so, here’s the URL:

I repeat:

Except you don’t.

You’re such an obvious Hillary Clinton shill, just trying to muddy the waters with deflections, distractions and insults on every one of these articles.

So now Donald Trump gets to nominate THREE Supreme Court justices in the next 4 years?!?!

Don’t get me wrong—there’s no excuse for death threats or the misogynistic crap that was flung at her regardless of your alleged gripe.

A-freakin’-men.

This is a lie propagated by the DNC establishment and complicit, corporate-owned media—Sanders’ supporters were booing and angry, but there was no violence. There was security all over and yet no arrests. The chair-throwing thing has been debunked.

I’m not on Twitter, rockstar.

Yeah, that never happened. Just another blatant lie told by the DNC establishment in an effort to coronate their favorite.

I certainly do.

Trump’s rhetoric is definitely uglier. There is no debate about that, but he is pandering to a group that thrives on that rhetoric. Hillary Clinton’s rhetoric is more hopeful and supportive of the middle class, but her actions support no such faith.