I gotta say, you are destroying the author from the perspective of logic/substance/applied knowledge.
I gotta say, you are destroying the author from the perspective of logic/substance/applied knowledge.
But saying it is “creepy as fuck” is not an indictment of this entire phenomenon i.e. a Hitler sculpture commanding eight figures on the art market. As far as I understand it, being “creepy as fuck” is often the allure to certain pieces of art.
This is the response of someone who is intelligent, but caught in the “wrong” and recognizes it.
It’s not necessarily about respect, though.
As far as I’m aware, all of the walking back of punishment was done via settlement. Has any court actually ruled against the NCAA? And weren’t most of those legal challenges filed in PA state courts? That the NCAA—a hopelessly incompetent and greedy clusterfuck if ever one existed—didn’t want to press its case in a…
If you mean the NCAA lacked the authority to punish Penn State for allowing a serial molester of at-risk children to operate by exploiting his connections to the football program for 30 years because reporting him would’ve damaged the reputation of the program, you’re wrong.
“There IS something wrong w you if you can’t admit that axeing the fb program will ruin every other sport at PSU.”
“So if I’m not for completely removing the football program, I’m for child molestation or aren’t also deeply offended by what happened?”
Yawn.
This is not a convincing argument on any level.
Nope.
Damn, man.
The best-case scenario here is a leader, who kept tight, almost-exclusive control over a major college football program for 50 years, somehow remained sincerely ignorant about a serial child molester, who was targeting underprivileged, vulnerable children through the molester’s major college-football-program-enabled…
I almost want to create a Twitter account to like this tweet.
Ugh, your point made me go back to look at the author and I forgot this was the guy who Tony dipshit Kornheiser tried to get blackballed b/c of some petty little tiff or something.
True, but the editorial staff—such as it is—still approved the idea/publishing.
No, this is a puff piece and a poorly executed one: