Nah.

Of all the justifiable reasons to hate Stanford, you picked Condoleeza Rice as the one to single out?!?!

To be fair, our speciality is championships that nobody notices except for the good folks in charge of the Directors Cup.

How can you say he deserves better when this situation is a direct function of his own choices?

But how is that NOT on LeBron James?

Sure, no argument whatsoever.

“The truth is, going to Kentucky gives you a better shot of getting to the NBA.”

Anthony Davis went No. 1 overall.

Meh, John Wall, DeMarcus Cousins and Anthony Davis were all top of the heap talents so, of course, they’re going to be near the top of the heap. But the point is that none of these players has maxed out his potential to date.

I appreciate that b/c I’ve had more dialogues than I care to admit with Hillary Clinton backers and I’ve met nothing but denial, which is slowly driving me insane.

I’ve had this debate elsewhere—while I don’t think Hillary Clinton would stop campaign finance reform, I don’t think she would undertake the unpopular onus of pushing for it, which is what’s necessary.

Why are these two things mutually exclusive?

Good deal.

I agree on arguing with like-minded people and you seem to be one, but I’ve been surprised to find how many of Clinton’s supporters are not actually like-minded with progressivism.

That’s not really what I said, is it?

The answer is a grumpy, imperfect idealist who might be stubborn enough to deliver on some of those ideals if given a chance.

“funny that you seem to limit the addiction to campaign $$ to the clinton campaign.”

This is why you can make a credible argument that Hillary Clinton is a more dangerous candidate than Donald Trump.

Cue all the Hillary Clinton mouthbreathers who will promise you, with a straight face, that all those contributions don’t mean anything.

In all sincerity, that’s a gorgeous swing.