And Michelle Alexander? She must be misinformed, too.

Yes, the links say those things happened in February of 2016.

Most of that comment doesn’t withstand even mild scrutiny and none of it answers my question.

You’re just flat-out wrong:

Like I said, bullshit.

“You patronize like this and then wonder why your candidate gets voted against.”

I get the horror at the prospect of Trump or any GOP knuckledragger, and your point about the Bernie Bros being fine no matter what happens is excellent.

You are implicitly saying it’s logical to base a vote for President of the United States on the appeal of an anonymous Internet user.

“I’m happy to hear why Clinton is the best candidate for people of color, but instead I usually get shut down as attempting to whitesplain, mansplain, or whatever.”

I disagree, but I’m obviously pro-Sanders and certainly don’t think Clinton handled the situations horribly.

I call the first one dismissive b/c of her tone and the fact she glibly said “Now back to the issues” after the first protester was escorted away. This implies the protestor was not raising real issues.

Let’s assume this is true. I’ve seen no evidence that Barack Obama ever took millions of dollars from private-prison companies and used private-prison lobbyists on his campaign staff, but it’s certainly possible.

No.

There are two credible reasons to support Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders: you directly benefit from the status quo that will continue to exacerbate income inequality in this country and her gender.

This is how Hillary Clinton always reacts when challenged.

This is the kind of typical bullshit that the mainstream media won’t be able to paper over when it’s down to just Hillary Clinton and a Republican or that orange mutant running for PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

I despise Curt Schilling with the gusts of a thousand winds, but he’s 100-percent correct about everything except the Hillary-to-prison, right-wing lunacy.

This guy is running around like a crazy person on stage, sweating profusely and I’m supposed to believe he’s NOT on cocaine?

I don’t even think the 2nd T was called by the same ref. To me, it looks like the original ref hands Rondo the ball and Rajon refuses to accept it initially. At that point, the ref at the top of the screen near half court has seen enough and gives him the 2nd T.

Are you suggesting Rajon Rondo, a professional basketball player for almost a decade, can’t be expected to catch that initial bounce pass from the ref?!