She made her decision to voice her beliefs, was not impeded from doing so, and has accepted the consequences.

How do you tell the difference between a liberal doing a satire of a conservative and a conservative doing a satire of what liberals think of conservatives?

The author is clearly saying that the LA Galaxy are one of the best (“premier) teams in MLS and therefore their inability to do a simple task reflects poorly on the league as a whole.

I may have gotten confused in the thread as to who was saying what.

I’ll regret engaging with you on this, but here are some facts for you:

My wife’s parents are professors and they encountered this problem endlessly while traveling to international conferences with her when she was a teenager. Complications with customs, hotels, etc.

One thing to consider is that if you plan on having children, being the parent with a different last name than the child can introduce a whole of host of complications when it comes to schools, health care providers, and travel - especially international travel. Diety of your choice help you if both parents have…

*Deleted because I missed the part of your comment where you said you do not want kids*

You know you have a strong argument when you have to focus on an autocorrect capitalization mistake in a counterpoint.

There are very strict limits on how Congress can motivate states into this type of action though. First, the coercion has to be explicit. Second, the withholding of funds has to be in some way related to the coerced activity. And the end result cannot be coercive. So your statement that Congress can coerce states…

Not a fan of the Process. Hate Sam Hinkie.

I’m not sure how relevant “Average Age” is to the discussion of which of these teams has the brighter future.

A team you cheer for has two incredibly young players that had played a total of zero minutes in the playoffs prior to April of this year. They improved by almost twenty five wins this year and have a legitimate claim to being a Top 5 team in the league and are definitely a top 10 team. Again, this is with their two…

You “relish” a bunch of young, talented, fun players not developing properly and squandering their careers?

A back up point guard taking a shot at another back up point guard who he beat last round instead of focusing on guarding the way better players he’s facing literally in an hour or so . . .

I’m not sure we have enough detail here to know if that’s a viable option. If it might make the difference between making a regional or state tournament, should the team really forfeit and forego the option?

“If you had been asked to imagine how Melo might tank OKC’s season last summer, you probably would have pictured him demanding the ball on the block at every opportunity and sourly grinding away possessions with his jab step.”

Don’t blame the Arizona Supreme Court.

Best chose to show up when asked to by defense counsel for Jackson and Olding. He wasn’t subpoenaed or ordered to be there. He took these actions because he wanted to help make sure his friends did not go to prison for rape.

You may not be familiar with this as you claim to be new to the case, but there was a large public outcry regarding Best’s appearance at the trial, including demands to strip him of the Irish captaincy. This can be confirmed through numerous news sources, as well as through social media.