I don't get Mike's excitement. Other than, perhaps, the world building mechanic, every "new" idea they talked about at the reveal has been done or will be done by other MMOs.

Hate to rain on EQ players parade, but, honestly, it looks like they took WildStar and slapped a slightly different, cell shaded coat of paint on it. Almost everything they featured in the reveal and panel has either already been shown as being part of WildStar, from the combat, classes, movement, destructible…

I watched this and a little part of me died inside. Was it just me? Okay then...>.>

Success in that the news of it was received positively by both elements in the casual player base and even the hard core raider playerbase, though the percentage was much smaller in the later.

My guess is a freemium model which, to be honest, is incredibly depressing news. Blizzard and WoW has always distinguished itself by having a great MMO that gives everyone a complete experience as long as you sub and, obviously, purchase the expansions. Even the "free trial" wasn't a hindrance.

Could have gotten an April O'Neil that looks like the above in the new TMNT movie. Instead? What Megan Fox looks like in the production photos. I'm going to go weep for my childhood in a corner now.

Anna was contracted by Irrational to be 'the face' of Elizabeth for the original promotion of the game and was, likewise, used to tweak Liz's box art appearance. It would make sense that she would have learned of 'Burial At Sea' via the folks at Irrational. My guess is we'll be seeing more of her new Elizabeth Cosplay…

Might be a superfluous question since, for some, the answer is obvious but I've been getting confused about one thing from the various interviews with Ken. Is the femme fatale inspired, crime noir Liz in Burial At Sea supposed to be *the* Elizabeth from the core game? Did she jump into a tear at some point during her…

Considering Neil Druckmann himself as well as Troy Baker and Ashley Johnson gave it an unequivocal "Hell Yeah!" in approval on Twitter and linked everyone in the fan community to the YouTube channel, it could very well be considered as official as it gets. Much as when Bethesda and Chris Avellone jumped behind the…

(*Spoilers* -redundant-) For all those harping on and on about "Elizabeth is always Booker's daughter across all the realities in the game..." Keep in mind that this could very well be a pocket universe that is in no way connected to the multiverses we see/know are a part of the Infinite story.

(*Spoilers*) This made me weep in joy (Burial At Sea did anyway, not Clash in the Clouds. Screw that pointless waste of production resources...). Only hope, as other have pointed out, that Liz is *not* Booker's daughter in this reality. I'm still feeling kicked in the heart, teeth, *and* man-purse by that Twist after…

And now the song will be stuck in my brain all day. Darn you Mike Fahey! (*shakes fist*)

I know my kind aren't welcome here, but, is there ever a chance we might see this game ported to consoles? I mean, there was the Shadowrun for SNES (which some folks remember with mixed reactions...) and this looks so insanely awesome I can't help but tear up at the thought of never being able to play it because I…

Short answer: Yes. Nothing that sets new ground or breaks the mold. But, especially for developer relatively new to the RPG realm, it's pretty impressive work. You likely won't be wowed with the story, but some of the characters are well done and the gameplay mechanics (combat, stealth, and crafting), which really are…

Voice/dialog thing for the english translation was already fixed and has been added to the console version and the PC version. Basically they just brought in new *actual* voice actors for all the major character and resynced the mouth movements. Also, when last I played (I'll admit, not my own copy or PC) the serious…

For the record, it's a really solid game. Nothing groundbreaking, and the story is actioned packed with RPG cliches, but the game mechanics are pretty enjoyable and, overall, the thing is executed well. Really the only serious hiccup was the english voice acting which, honestly, sounded like they just grabbed people…

If you want to break it down realistically, I think most folks agree that Lucas never intended for Leia to be Luke's sister, or for Luke to even have a sibling regardless of what he's said.

Uh, no, when Bran first spied on them Jaime is giving her breasts some work and some oral as well, but Cersei spots Bran and, well, we know what happens. Later in GoT and the following books while Jaime is still at King's Landing we get one or two more sex scenes between them and one flashback via Cersei about her and…

What?! Don't know who you've been talking to, but there is a metric (*bleep*) ton of sex in the novels. Seriously, a lot. Some of which will pop up in later seasons. Most of it didn't even end up in the HBO series for the first few seasons.

You think Leia and Luke's relationship doesn't mirror Cersei and Jaime's? Not according to some Fan Fiction I've read O.o