UMM... They are pretty much the same, a little bigger, but design wise the same. It also depends on what type turbo. These are VGT's.

Ford doesn't have that reputation. The recent 6.7 likes to vomit turbos. They aren't that reliable, plus I don't think you realize that these tiny little turbos are putting out more boost that those WRX's are at 31psi.

Refer to other comment about Ford's very own Scorpion 6.7, known for puking turbos up until 2014.

It's just a tiny engine in a big engine bay. Most modern V6 fullsize pickups look like this. In the Ram, you can stand in between the radiator and the engine.

On board computers are rarely right.

The Scorpion 6.7 was just refreshed partially because of turbo failure, so Ford is not someone I overly trust with reliability with turbos. But with that said, I find the 2.7 interesting.

Turbo failure...Non Issue...Ford...HAHAHAHAHA! That was a good one. The whole reason the 6.7 got refreshed was because of early turbo failure.

Like when the turbo's and other things to do with them fail.

Mine is on it's third set, and is a 3.doubleslow due to the autotragic. It's one of those vehicles where there isn't really an argument in the favor of the automatic.

You sure it was a god awful mechanic, or the 3VZE itself? As a current owner of one, it kind of is a turd.

I love my second gen, if only it didn't have the 3.slow.

Modern coachbuilders!

That is most definitely a 2005-07 F250/350 Amarillo Edition.

2005-07 F250/350 Amarillo Edition at that.

The Camry engine that will propel the Camry to sixty in just over 5 seconds? I'll take that with a manual please.

From Chevrolet's website: http://media.chevrolet.com/media/us/en/ch…

A Chevy... With coil-overs and not torsion bars?

That is an ugly car. It looks more like a Beetle than a 911.

Have someone set your armpit hair on fire when you don't expect it, let's see you not crash.

Is this the V6 or the I4? My parents got the I4 as a rental, and it hunted gears worse than my old Toyota slushbox with over 180k miles on it.