You described every Toyota owner.

The CR-Z is a four seater elsewhere. I'd buy one with four seats. It automatically becomes a hypermile hatchback. That's like an entirely new segment. Practical and all the MpGees.

Boom.

Speculators can kiss my fucking ass.

Hexagonal wheel design mixed with a wheel arch alluding to an octagon. So much... Horrible.

*beep boop beep*

Gotta sell cars to fund that development, guys.

Leave it to Honda to keep that sickly, fucking awful, nasty gray interior color around. Especially the shiny plastic bits. Fucking barf (OMG).

I'm going to hell for that.

I feel like the GMC Terrain remains a better buy in this price range... Even if its platform is 7163782 models years old.

Horrible are Acura owners. Here, in Chicago, only the biggest assholes drive them. They all seem mad they couldn't afford something German, and try to justify their purchases with catchphrases like, "Honda reliability," and assertions like, "FWD is better in the snow," or, "Yeah, but the MDX looks nothing like the…

Except for its crashy ride and the 2.3T that is probably the worst engine from Honda. Ever.

No KITT Turbo Boost either.

This is a funny guy, lol.

It seems like they understand their target market and already have a working model that would see outside investment making it happen (cheaper for Nissan).

All of which is irrelevant, as this car is in California.

No one is talking about you.

Because I'd be buying it.

Spray clear over the "patina."

Agreed. We began a refresh to an Interceptor four years ago. It was finished two years later because finding every part took forever. We did a lot of the rewiring with modern parts because 1970s British electrics.