What about all those people (myself included) that live in an apartment? How are we going to charge these abominations?
What about all those people (myself included) that live in an apartment? How are we going to charge these abominations?
You seem like a nice guy who is able to coherently make an argument.
I can distinctly recall the day I decided to stop using Yellow Cab (and taxis). I asked to pay with credit card and the cabbie waved a wad of bills in my face while screaming at me, “Do you know what these are? US-F***ing-Dollars! That’s what I accept!”.
For a car for people who don’t care about cars, I’ll say:
This is how I actually feel about this.
Rudy Mancinas and people like him are the reason older 911 models are approaching ridiculous sale prices. He is a turd.
You’re correlating automotive enthusiasts with safe drivers. I think those two groups are very often exclusive.
After considerable thought, I have decided to devote today’s column to cars we hate. This may seem like an unusual…
Rally car suspension test.
I don’t get that logic though. If a car looks normal, but has insane power, you people hate it because it’s “looks don’t match it’s performance”. So then when the manufacturer puts a bunch of gaudy cladding and body kits on the car, you rip them right back off to call it a “sleeper”, and everyone suddenly loves the…
6.5 or go home.
I’ll be in my bunk.
1970 Mazda RX500. Mid-engined Rotary.
Wrong. pod-racing is awesome.
How the podracing scene should have gone.
The LMP002 looked damn fine doing it though.
Still vaporware until cars are in customer hands.
This 6x6 has potential but something looks off. Don’t know, regarding tires and the rest of the truck; they are too meaty, while the truck looks wimpy as hell. Either beef up the exterior of the truck t match the tires or use narrower rubber
Mercedes’ World Rally Championship effort from 1978 - 80 was just as unexpected as the car they chose to field, the 500 SLC.
You know, you could have easily said all that without being a dick.