*If you can find one. And if you do, good luck getting it at MSRP.
*If you can find one. And if you do, good luck getting it at MSRP.
“To lose so miserably” is pretty harsh considering how successful this LMP1 program has been so far.
(@ 1:00 mark) So perhaps it was one of the last Mercedes to be over-engineered for quality and durability.
320i, sport package, manual, fold down rear seats, cloth, manual seats, no sunroof. Cheap and ideal. Why can’t we have that?
WRX’s should be safe buys too, here in CA they’re pretty much the car equivalent of the Tacoma in the used market. STI’s are even better, with clean-titled ‘08 models still easily going for $25k+.
Sure it had a pretty design, but that ad accompanied by with its “Expensive means it’s good” marketing took away any sympathy I have for its inevitable death.
Honestly, if there was ever a brand that could avoid adding a CUV/SUV into their lineup to bump sales, it’d be Ferrari. Though some of their sales practices may be questionable (such as black-listing buyers for privately selling their cars), the capped production numbers seem to have successfully driven up both demand…
Sorry to say but these crushings have never been a statement about safety. The only reason why the law exist was to help Mercedes reduce sales loss to grey market imports.