jonny_wonny
jonny_wonny
jonny_wonny

Sure, tell that to social services.

Because he had to work early the next morning. Duh.

As I said, it just depends on the probabilities. Whether or not it is an "off chance" that determines if someone is a terrorist is information that neither you nor I know, but it is an assumption you seem to be making. My point was that it is theoretically possible that there is data which could provide a substantial

Killing people indiscriminately is immoral. That's as far as I can go with making statements of what morality might be. From that we can conclude that signature strikes and double taps carried out with or without the help of drones are immoral if they result in the indiscriminate death of human beings, just as any

So you're saying that signature strikes and double taps immoral, not drone warfare itself. I don't know what signature strikes and double taps are, but I'm assuming the concepts themselves have nothing to do with drones.

Why exactly is necessary war not any less immoral than superfluous war? Is it moral and right to just sit and let yourself be killed while other people are unjustly taking over your home? If that's morality then morality absolutely does not exist, because any species who embodied it wouldn't last a single generation.

So drone warfare is inherently immoral? What exactly makes it more immoral than us doing the same thing just with an actual human operator? Because as far as I know, drones are simply doing what we would be doing except risking one less life.

They mention on their site that there are areas they won't be able to map out due to legal restrictions. North Korea is one, US is another. I'm sure they won't be mapping out Iraq or Afghanistan anytime soon either.

I'm sure if they've gotten this far into the project they've considered the cost it's going to take to complete it and decided it's possible. What makes you so certain that you know something they don't?

I'd have to open my eyes pretty widely to see all of reddit at the same time.

Umm, no?

Yeah that was really strange how he said that...

I think you mean pessimism. Cynicism is the belief that people are generally selfish, whereas pessimism is a negative outlook.

I think it would have been better if it had just ended after he realized how to transform his gun back into a hand. I thought the few scenes that followed that were a little stupid.

Their wetware's not too bad either. :P

Probably something along the lines of "Boobs."

People laugh at videos of humans getting hurt all the time. What makes raccoons so special that they should get immunity from Internet humor?

When you're in the middle of a stadium surrounded by hundreds of people, I think it's safe to say most of your instincts have checked out.

Same thing happens to me, but I don't either of us suffer from clinical depression, which often times actually requires medication and other forms of therapy to cure.

I don't understand how people could think VR is a gimmick. If it's not going to be VR, what else could be the next evolution in multi-media entertainment? Or do people actually think that we've reached the pinnacle with our current technology?