Still here, still correct, still laughing at your autistic fervor.

You proved both of my points correct, Aspie McGee, and I thank you again for it.

I love how you act like you're winding me up for your own amusement then I just have to say one little thing and you're sputtering out another defensive essay. Counting the special its a 9-10 month gig. The show typically airs a full run every year with a couple of exceptions. Thus everything I've said is right…

I said "something like a 10 month per year gig". You've confirmed it is 9 and a bit months at least. Thanks for doing the legwork and backing up my original point. You're a real star.

Aspergers.

You don't seem to understand how production of a TV show works. You have this idea that any time not spent literally filming in front of a camera doesn't count as them working and thus, what, they should be free for other jobs? Have you heard of read throughs, costuming, makeup, ADR, things like that? Are you even…

If we accept your total of 8.5 months, throw in the extra month for the Xmas special and then tack on all post production and promotion work, that's more than ten months without breaking a sweat. You're simply wrong and possibly autistic in your refusal to accept as much.

Have you? It says right in the opening summary filming lasted a little over nine months. The special filmed from june to july. I don't "need to answer" anything either with your attitude being so shitty.

No, just over nine months to shoot the series then another month for the special.

Christ. In that case, you and I already cleared up that point long ago and have nothing else to talk about. Thank fuck.

The article is about equal pay in entertainment. To dismiss my opinion on that subject as "irrelevant" is a line of logic that leaves most opinions irrelevant on most subjects. It's a profoundly stupid dismissal tactic.

Nevertheless, the fact remains that how you feel about pay parity is irrelevant to the discussion.

You're just resorting to accusing me of these "tactics" with absolutely zero concession that what you said about me was patent nonsense pulled from thin air. Why am I jumping through hoops for your boring self?

I have no desire to get under your skin, you just rambled on with a completely off base summation of my thoughts, it really did sound like someone with issues completely unrelated to their target, looking to vent. I don't want to engage on "you want it all to go away because you think it's a fad" for the simple…

How could you say it was "long won" specific to this one role when this is the first time it's ever even been an issue?

When I said it was won I was referring specifically to this one role. Women in entertainment are overall paid less because there's less demand for them and less profit from their work, so that seems fair enough to me. And I know the controversy had no effect because this is already a hot button issue and, inept as…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wi…

If there's a win, it was already long won. This is being framed as if the recent fabricated outraged over BBC salaries is what ensured her rate of pay. And like I said, entertainment is not like an office job, straight equality in pay should not be expected or demanded.

So demonstrate what I said that was incorrect and why. Something tells me you'll run off instead.

It's not any kind of "win" in the sense a battle was being fought. She was never going to come into the show and be paid any less than him in today's political climate. The entire uproar over disparities in BBC pay is nonsense anyway, they are TV personalities for a reason, it's not a load of office jobs where it…