And the quote from the NYT is different from Lionel's quote. he drew his own conclusion from the NYT report then repackaged it into a paraphrased quote which was not accurate. It's like talking to a brick wall on here, honestly.

Your hysteria is cute but there still has not been any evidence of Trump-Russia collusion presented in any open forum yet. I'd love to resume this when all investigation has ended with zero action against Trump or his team but I suspect you will slink off in bitter shame at that point, never to respond again.

Well I'm not particularly interested in arguing something I don't believe but that's a silly question to be honest. There are two immediately obvious reasons. First; to stop anything else being released. Secondly to prevent him being able to publicly verify any of the story if he chose to come out with it. …

I guess it escaped your attention that my original point was about double standards. And that different timezones exist in the world.

Except it was.

I'm not asking any questions myself. I don't care that much either way.

That isn't a lie, it is an interpretation.

He has every right to draw his own conclusions with regard to Trump's motives. He doesn't get to present those conclusions as paraphrased quotes. That's called lying.

You should post proof Trump directed the DNC hack or stop stating it as fact.

Thanks for that aside. Now quote the part where he said he "had to fire Comey because of all the pressure Comey was putting on him over his connections to Russia". Because what you just posted doesn't say that.

I think you accidentally pasted the wrong links, because they do not support or prove your allegations in any way.

You're confusing evidence and proof.

Quote the part that says what you claimed. Or admit you cannot.

And we know My So-Called President asked the Russians to do that.

We know Rich wasn't the leak because there's absolutely no evidence to support it, that's how.

That's not what Trump said at all, or was even reported to have said. You're simply lying.

I think there are some fair questions about the suspicious nature of Rich's murder. I'm not convinced it was a big DNC conspiracy but there are threads worth looking into. And the fact you keep repeating that 17 intelligence agencies are saying Trump's campaign and the Kremlin are linked shows you really don't know…

The vast, vast majority of those kinds of stories have not been proven true or corroborated in any way after the original reporting. You're simply letting your bias cloud your honesty.

Fox didn't state Seth leaked anything, they featured a guest who is investigating the case and says this is what he has been told. I don't see how that's any worse than literally every other news station trying to bring down Trump's presidency with hundreds of stories from "unnamed sources" and no accompanying…

Typos are hilartious!