jonjonb9--disqus
Thundercant
jonjonb9--disqus

That's a hell of a stretch to explain this patently attention seeking decision.

I don't even watch the show and I had read about it pretty much immediately after the episode aired. There's been plenty of attention given.

Attention. Since you asked. They didn't need to "make whiteness the default". It was supposed to be a half Pakistani child ffs, being totes white would've been silly too. But a left field choice like a race that isn't genetically included in the mix at all? Yeah that's not a reasonable choice in telling their

It's not a thing.

Pakistani man + white woman doesn't = black baby no matter how you cut it. This was done precisely for the attention it got.

I'm not taking sides; everyone got it wrong at every stage. But I guess that makes me a fucking Nazi sympathizer to hysterical lunatics like yourself.

I'm sure their offerings will be consistently original and hilarious, as all the Trump stuff so far has been. Sigh.

Sounds like the av club's wet dream.

I'm under no illusions of being either. I just live in the real world where all this could have been easily avoided by everyone.

They are certified law enforcement officers; police. What weapons they do or don't carry is irrelevant to that fact. And the response you're citing didn't accuse the man of anything, it wasn't even referring to him, again; reading comprehension.

Chicago aviation police are real police. And I never said he earned himself a felony charge, your reading comprehension is just shitty, since I also never defended the cop or said what happened to the man was justified. It was just legal, predictable and avoidable. I also said it shouldn't have gone down more than

Invaluable input.

The rules are mostly not bad. Just badly applied here in an incident where nobody was at their best.

Don't bring up dignity then complain when your point is destroyed.

No, "it shouldn't have happened but everybody bears some responsibility by the end of it".

I don't think any of this was good and have clearly said it shouldn't have happened. Nothing in any of my posts has indicated otherwise either. You jumped to a conclusion and you got it wrong. And now you're floundering because you lumped me in with a group of people you invented within your own peanut head.

"I realised my error and now must make a hasty retreat lest I have to admit as much" - you, just then.

Nothing will happen to him over this, you wait and see.

…so basically, you'll pull anything you can think of out your ass to "deflect" from the fact you attributed to me a hypocrisy I don't practice and have no way to back down from that without *gasp* admitting to being wrong.

Well for starters you're wrong, he doesn't. Secondly you disregarded the part where I said it shouldn't have happened to essentially blast me for approving of this incident.