Again, silly goose: lower regs does not mean no regs.
Again, silly goose: lower regs does not mean no regs.
It's so sweet how you conflate lowering regulations with having none at all. Which is not what I or anyone on the right has ever said.
She believed she was?!?!?!
You're so right. What advantage could one possibly get in our society when lying about being a minority in the workplace?
We need way MORE regulations. That always works! Like…uhh…when…uh…
Lower regulations mean lower growth…
Words like "small amount of Native American ancestry"?
Except she has no "small amount of Native American ancestry" and there's zero evidence that she does.
No, that's all true.
Yep. That's true.
There's absolutely some truth to that. I don't disagree.
So, you're arguing FOR Trump now?
Not sure to what it is you're referring.
I dunno. Can't say I've ever seen one like that.
That is a very accurate description of the last few years, yes.
Not if it comes through job growth instead of stock market growth.
Those types of responses are ridiculous and unproductive and sadly too common on both sides.
You really like those ad hominem attacks. I don't blame you- they're great arguments!
There's my positive answer.
Excellent argument.