I don’t see HughesNet & Viasat survive the decade if SpaceX achieves even 10% of its ambitions.

Do explain, please.

Yes and no, it depends on how you look at it.

Yet, we won’t see Felton react to this.

I agree

Relax dude, pretty much anything essential can be controlled through the stalks or steering wheel, like any traditional car.

I guess that comes down to preference. I personally like it a lot, in comparison to the convoluted dashboards you find in “traditional” cars.

You’re forgetting about the lack of fuels on the moon.

I don’t think it’s fair to dismiss someone because of their income, high or low. There’s surely some good billionaires, as there are some “bad” people that have little to no wealth.

They’ll probably think the only conclusion is that it’s god’s work.

dude calm down...

Wrong, cars shipped with the Autopilot V2 hardware currently have no autonomous driving systems and are just in “shadow mode”, learning about the roads & the rest of the environment.

the 200 cars per week is only that specific P100D model, all in all, Tesla is producing around 2000-2200 cars a week.

Actually, as per Elon’s twitter account, landing burns occur in the following configurations for GEO launches:

The US government requires additional procedures to be done for their launches. SX is still charging less than half the price of its nearest competitor as well, for what it’s worth.

I’d be goddamn surprised if those people even considered living in a busy city centre, from their quiet rural mountainous village.

Those videos are misleading. You can’t say that because the Gates Foundation invests into a company that does some unethical stuff, it supports the unethical practices themselves.