It's a hyperbola.

It's a hyperbola.

Therefore M = Z

California...

If we have two populations A and B and we find out that A tends to be better at a certain task than B, does that mean that A is always better than B at that task?

In areas that do not depend on raw physical strength, men and women are equal. The fact is "pro-gaming" is not really an inclusive environment and in some circumstances actively discourages women from competing. However this problem is not just exclusive to esports, but sports in general.

It is purely a numbers thing. Player ability, regardless of gender, follows a gaussian distribution. If a 1000 males play and only 5% are good enough to go "pro" then there will be 50 players who are good enough in that pool. The problem is that there's not an equal number of women who also play. To reiterate: it's a…

I couldn't agree more with you.

I'm getting a Worf vibe from this one.

And now the cheetahmen...

I prefer Dance in the dark myself. :)

You do have a point there, and the fact that it was a glacial period (OIS 4) probably didn't help things. We were nearly extinct (2-5 thousand individuals) and if the population decreased any more then we would have reached a point of no return in terms of the viability of a population.

Every one outside africa that is.

Everyone outside africa that is.

Worldbuilding gives context to the content of the storyline.