jojowiththeflow
jojowiththeflow
jojowiththeflow

Bill’s past seems to do Hilary’s career more damage than it ever did his own. That said, in any other circumstance I think it would be fair to ask Hilary about sticking with a cheating husband — but here, used by Trump in a bizarre attempt at whataboutery to deflect from his own (past) behaviour and (current?)

Gif appeared in my vision in perfect sync to the music coming out of my radio... spooky

If Sasha and Malia are a reflection of their parents, and develop presidential ambitions, there is hope for future generations <3

If ever you wanted a FLOTUS to run for POTUS...

I don’t know, but it IS the reason J.K. Rowling is known as J.K. Rowling rather than Jo Rowling. It was a decision her publisher made on publishing the first Harry Potter book, before she & her work became so well known.

I quite fancy myself as a peace-loving liberal lefty type, but then I see another headline asserting that a woman who doesn’t have children must by default be a woman who is so agonisingly desperate to have children that anytime you see a picture of her, you must look at her and consider she may be expecting, because,

Mary Berry to try out the space cake Martha and Snoop will be baking?

I’ve read so much about this case and simply DO NOT UNDERSTAND how so many people still think she’s guilty

It must be horrible to have to give a press conference straight after a match, particularly a lost match, when adrenaline’s still racing through your blood. How can you even suppress the desire to smash things, sit down and politely answer questions?

Ladies and gentlemen we have a verdict: GUILTY
and a sentence: SIX YEARS

Wrong again.

You’re wrong.

See my other comment above. Through my work for broadcasters I’ve gained some knowledge, I’m just seeking to find out where the UK’s legal boundaries lie.

Press are allowed to report, not comment as this could prejudice the case. By the same token I’m pretty sure that as a UK resident you can’t post your opinion on your personal social media profile until a case is over. I’ve worked for UK-based broadcasters and remember they were hosting a phone-in about a certain case

Either your reading comprehension’s lacking or you may want to read this.

I’m sure if I discussed the case in the pub down the road I’d be okay, but if I shared my opinion somewhere where quite an audience might see/hear/read it, that might be illegal under English law. As far as I’m aware only journalists and jurors have ever been jailed for such offences, but still... I wouldn’t want to

Excellent use of the word ‘shitty’ in this context :D

Any UK-based lawyers on here? Reason I’m asking is: this is an ongoing trial in the UK so within the UK commenting on or discussing it could be considered contempt of court; not a problem for Jezebel because Jezebel is based in the US, but if I comment on here, as a UK resident on this American website... what’s the