Can ya'll show me an example of people blaming Don Peter's (female) victims?
Can ya'll show me an example of people blaming Don Peter's (female) victims?
Are you aware of what happened when a teacher became aware of the gang-rape of the 11 year old? The police were called immediately and they rounded up everybody they could identify them and charged them with rape. They removed the girl from her evidently horrible home and placed her into a foster family. They even…
Indeed. Apparently with little boys—and assuming you don't just ignore it entirely—you write off shower rape as "horseplay" and give a stern warning not to do it again.
I appreciate a good satire as much as the next person, but—to trot out that tired cliche—it's just too soon for this.
Indeed. No surprise that when you create incentives—in the Gawker blog family's case, unique viewers => higher pay—people respond to them.
That's it. The author is clearly (to me anyway) intending to insult the cameraman by suggesting that he might be gay/like performing oral.
What's with the casual homophobia in this post? Sheesh.
Is Diaz just trolling since trolling = page views = $ and he needs to make rent? At any rate, somebody needs to change his diaper, ASAP. If he gets a rash, we're going to have to put up with this for days.
Obviously, it's your prerogative to prefer distorted audio. But it's ridiculous to argue that it's not distorted. Look, lots of people, sometimes including me, like the effects of hipstamatic-style photo filters. Why are those folks able to enjoy their pleasing distortions without pretending like the hipstamatic…
That's awesome. I hold up the cables by myself. It really makes the mid-range sing.
$10,000 amps made with long-obsolete technology are per se snake oil. Now, can I interest you in my speaker cable lifts? Special this weekend at $500 a piece. They'll really bring out the warmth of those tubes.
Gizmodo's embrace of audio snake oil is disheartening.
This. The Ramseys got raked over the coals repeatedly (and rightly so, IMO).
What does it mean when there's no coverage of a missing white child?
Is the premise of this that there are two missing babies in the entire world? Another day, another smug, race-baiting post that pretends that anybody should care that People magazine — People magazine! — caters to the obsessions of weird white people.
1) No, that's a quote based on an incorrect analysis of Roe v. Wade. The supporters are pretending—because it's not likely that they're really so misinformed that they believe it—that if they play a word game in the Miss. constitution, there will be no federal constitutional problem with outlawing all abortions. As…
We also spent a long time talking about Tracy Morgan's homophobia.
There's no need to be rude.
You've got your facts wrong. M.B.'s name is being provided to the defense; it will not be publicly disclosed.
I'll bet anyone $1000 that her PR people set up this article. She knew, at least to a rough approximation, what it was going to be like. (And yeah, that is also a depressing commentary on the state of journalism.)