I didn't, but I do now. Nice observation. I wonder if that was director Matt Shakman's idea. I'm a credit watcher, so I was happy to see an "It's Always Sunny" director do such a great job with this complicated episode.

Yeah, I'd just give an "What? I didn't hear that," and then run away banging pots and pans and yelling "Lalalalalalala…"

I'm just curious, should right wing celebrities be blackballed from Hollywood? Is that what you're saying? Look, nobody likes Geraldo, but you guys are so over the fucking top decrying any hint of a Republican on anything it's weird.
Again, as I always note, not a republican, just a liberal that finds this posturing to…

"Make a remake? Don't go down that road! DON'T GO DOWN THAT ROW-AD!"

It's oddly comical, both intentionally, and unintentionally. Pascow is mostly the latter.

Chief!

Conforming art and fiction to be a certain way isn't going to change the hearts and minds of ignorant people with dug-in, immovable prejudices.

Trans people do have better representation now and that matters because it allows acceptance. I don't think dredging up a sketch from the 90s, that I thought was always about just not knowing which gender she was, coupled with her being coy about it, just weakens any argument. Silence of the Lambs is now retroactively…

I have issues with people saying one individual character's motivations imply that the audience is suppose to feel a specific way about ALL people based on that one character. It's got nothing to do with whatever issue people are talking about, it's about art, and writing. Everyone is looking for that perfect…

That was never a good movie to begin with. And they really just wanted to make a Crying Game joke, and then dragged it on to a ridiculous degree. I agree that it did have a very "Ha ha because Trans" tone. Didn't sit right with me back then and I was an ignorant kid back then.

I don't remember that at all. Everyone sees things differently. Has this always been your view of Silence of the Lambs, or has it become your view through trans awareness?

Fictional characters do not represent ALL people. This argument is infuriating. Mainly because in order for it to be true, you'd have to use it for every fictional character and the argument breaks down.

Jill Soloway, with the hottest of takes. Remember all the people upset over the Pat character in the 90s? Remember all the people referring to Pat as non-binary? Remember how we all knew it wasn't just a dumb character idea about a person whose gender was always left ambiguous? No? Me neither.

I don't think so because I was listening for his name.
A few episodes back when Dougie was talking to Mullens and that picture of him was overhead, I thought Coop was going to have an epiphany since the handsome dark haired man and the grey haired man are the same person (Leland / BOB).

This show really isn't intended to be "reviewed" until seen in it's entirety. I give reviewers crap on here all the time, but they really are doing a good job not critiquing things they don't understand.

She'll be a tough dame to beat.
Tough.

We're all adults. I think we can find a fictional character attractive without giving our endorsement of their fictional actions.

The cop Vin Mackey, from season one, played Finn's dad (Annette Beining as herself played the mom) sang the song for a crazy long time. It was the yearly, Tony Has a Trippy Dream episode.

I don't really agree with the internet / Twitterverse that Lynch was "trolling" us with a James Hurley performance. Trolling implies contempt. It seemed more like something he did because he thought it would be awesome. It got a visceral reaction out of me and my wife as soon as it began.
The Sopranos had some trolling…

"Yeah, it's Wine O Clock!"