You can always get Nine mail which encrypts the email and doesn’t take over your device via device administrator.

It depends, we may be reaching the statute of limitations on some of those charges. I don’t think NY would want to wait until the conclusion of the federal trial. I’d probably indict him and then ask for the judge to suspend the hearing until the federal matter is resolved. But, I wouldn’t want that statute of…

I agree with this, but the indictment, which I read through, is all federal crimes. Unless Schneiderman comes out with his own indictment, it’s all federal. However, being a NY resident I can definitely say, if any AG is going to do it, it’ll be Schneiderman. That guy has been taking on huge players for a long time…

I would agree that not EVERYONE who moves to a city works in a city (want is not an issue, because it’s more of a need based decision). But, it is nearly axiomatic that if you move to a large metro region, you’re probably working in the city, because that’s where most of the jobs are.

I agree but every real gain that workers have had over the last century, especially the labor laws that have been enacted, is because of unions.

Yeah, basically. It’s “what would the hypothetical reasonable person do in the same or similar circumstance.” So, it’s objective, and that objective action is compared to the actions of a party to a suit.

And I love you transaction guys. If it wasn’t for your shitty, mindless drafting there wouldn’t be so many disagreements and I wouldn’t have so much work. I wish you were in my jurisdiction. I can tell you would get me sooooo many billables.

There are only 2 good tax LLMs. And I totally believe you are a tax attorney by your inability to carry an argument.

I don’t necessarily disagree but I would point out that the problem, in this case, is an environmental problem and not a fundamental problem with unions.

If it’s possible to craft laws to limit corporate abuses then it is possible to craft laws to limit union abuses

I promise you, I’m one of the most liberal people you’ll ever meet. But, unlike you apparently, I don’t have blinders on. Believe it or not, liberals can do things that are just as bad as Republicans. People can be bad, regardless of their beliefs.

Corporate and tax attorney, not a paralegal. Magna from law school, #1 from Tax LLM from a top 5 university. Former federal district court clerk.

Well... that’s kind of the point. If I “worked in the suburbs” my commute would be like 5 minutes because I live in the suburbs.

So... waahhhhhhh. That’s your opinion, whining? Keep studying, maybe one day you’ll be an actual lawyer.

An accusation that an employee BROKE THE LAW means the employee BROKE THE LAW because employers never lie and say an employee BROKE THE LAW when they didn’t in order to fire the employee if the CBA would prevent them from doing so otherwise.

Oh, so you’re like a first year law student? Because you talk a good game, but your substance comes up rather short. Have you even drafted a contract? Reasonable is often a modifier that is used and has legal significance.

No, it’s really not. The “reasonable person standard” is an OBJECTIVE standard. This is literally beyond debate.

Then you must also think that this “rise of more employer power” will by definition be followed by a rise in more union power as the pendulum swings back. Again, that’s what pendulums do.

But... you’re comparing apples to oranges. People can make a living without unions because we have laws. People can’t make a living without employers (not everyone can be an entrepreneur).

Quality of cars is a weird metric when you’ve been talking about financial health.