I mean, I can swear like a fucking sailor if that will help sway your fucking opinion.

I disagree with literally 100% of what you’ve said. Citing one example means nothing. Yes, there are private unions, but they are dying off because their demands get into the revenge territory.

The union must represent their members regardless of their personal feelings about the member’s conduct.

“unreasonable” isn’t an objective metric.

Uh, yes they have.

I mean, what do you want me to do, give you every single example I’ve ever seen? I don’t have that kind of time. But, shouldn’t it be relatively obvious that union participation has is at like 6.5% (without public unions) and it’s certainly not because union protections have weakened (they’re insanely strong, like…

Because... basically every company with a substantial union presence has gone out of business, required a massive bailout, or is in the red. Sure, there are some exceptions, but they are few and far between.

Oh, I’m a corporate and tax attorney now and I’m happy to help my employer clients. My conscience couldn’t take representing unions anymore. I felt like a terrible person and a horrible lawyer for doing the things I had to do because of the union clients.

Do you want me to go into detail? Because I can. I was part of a union as an employee. I was a union attorney. I am a corporate attorney who represents many employees.

But you see what will happen right? I don’t disagree that employers have the power now. Totally true. But, if unions come into power, they won’t seek to right the wrongs, they’ll seek revenge. They will seek punishment. Which, in turn, will fuel the rise of more employer power.

Because part of any analysis requires input from both sides.

But you watch, the same Republicans that inked this deal will then turn around and say how government is wasteful and use examples like this as “proof” the government cannot do the job.

And how long is your commute? Mine’s 12 minutes into my city and I live in the suburbs. We paid $255,000 in 2014 for a 2600 sqft house in the nicest suburb in the metro area.

And only half a million dollars for a tiny house. What a deal!

But... that’s already required.

So, you’re saying that Trump’s tax plan is bullshit? I can support that, because it is. Under his plan, those in that range you’ve identified will unequivocally pay more (we’ll, let’s narrow that down to incomes between $200,000 - $400,000, that makes speaking about brackets easier).

As a tax attorney married to a physician we started our professional lives in the top 10% and we’ll end in likely the top 0.1%. Taxing the rich more heavily will not see us “give up everything we worked so hard for.”

No one raises a child (let’s drop the idea that being a scumbag is only a male thing) to be this way and no amount of good parenting will prevent a person to be like this.

Dude, you’ve been caught in several lies. I think we both know who here is debating with facts and evidence and who is making shit up.

Oh, I’m sorry, did I miss the memo where “Expansion” and “Season” are now the same word? Hmm... I guess I and the rest of the English speaking world missed that one. And, citing a blog or forum isn’t exactly going to support your point. So... try again.